Live data from Hacker News

Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

workingwa.org

701–710 of 718 posts

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#701

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I for one wasn't aware of a no-tip culture in San Francisco. I would totally not do it provided I was absolutely sure that this culture was a thing.

You should start this in your city! We call "wasters" the waiters that expect a tip here.

Actually, I'm currently in San Francisco, and I haven't heard anything of the sort. I probably should ask around though.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#702

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You all are being duped into contrived outrage. The example given in the OP link is very misleading and it is quite obviously cherry picking (to spark emotion) and is actually an outright lie. The truth is that Insticart actually pays a $10 minimum per delivery (this isn't even mentioned in the OP link) So how did this person make 80 cents an hour? The delivery was 0.7 miles and took 69 minutes. Ironically, under Ins…

Nice try trolling. Nobody can possibly be this shitty.

If the facts that I stated are incorrect, cite your sources. If you wish to debate something I said... I welcome it.

You place yourself in a weak position philosophically and argumentatively simply going for the old dumb bully method of personal attacks, character assassination, shouting someone down, insults ETC.

Is that really the best you can do? I pointed out inaccurate information and information gaps in this story. This claim reeks heavily and obviously of major bias. I wouldn't be surprised in an Instacart competitor actually is behind this. It's sad that others in this thread didn't already do the same. The group think and blind social justice here is really sad. There are many people here far smarter than I, yet they cannot see when such a weak and slanderous smear attempt is made?

If you want to change the labor laws to make tips and wage separate then go ahead. But just know that every restaurant and service company in states that allow this do it. If a certain business doesn't, they will have a hard time competing against the company across the street who does.

This 80 cents an hour case is so factually incorrect and lacking specifics that you and others should frankly be embarrassed to be making judgments based on it.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#703

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You all are being duped into contrived outrage. The example given in the OP link is very misleading and it is quite obviously cherry picking (to spark emotion) and is actually an outright lie. The truth is that Insticart actually pays a $10 minimum per delivery (this isn't even mentioned in the OP link) So how did this person make 80 cents an hour? The delivery was 0.7 miles and took 69 minutes. Ironically, under Ins…

Nice try trolling. Nobody can possibly be this shitty.

Attacking another user like this is a bannable offence on HN. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#704
post #703

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Nice try trolling. Nobody can possibly be this shitty.

Attacking another user like this is a bannable offence on HN. Please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and follow the rules when posting here.

[deleted]

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#705
post #10

There's a related blog post up on Medium by this same group (Working Washington) where they placed the same order, once with tip and once without, so people could directly compare. From my perspective Instacart is stealing from its customers and workers by doing this. I'm a huge fan of instacart (my fiance and I use it regularly), but this is definitely going to push me away from the platform. At a minimum I'm going…

100%. I expect a class action suit from consumers.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#706

I've always wondered why someone hasn't tried to reverse the model on these delivery service apps (postmates, doordash, instacart) Instead of delivery people blindly accepting orders and hoping for the best, the people who are requesting the delivery should have to set a rate at order time and make the full order and destination visible so couriers can decide if it's worth it and make a counter-offer if it's too low…

> the people who are requesting the delivery should have to set a rate at order time

That's an interesting idea --- reminds me of e-coins with variable transaction fees. You can offer more if you want people to work on your transaction faster.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#707
post #691
post #633

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's better explained on this page than how I can explain it: https://www.tripsavvy.com/tipping-in-japan-1458316

> In countries such as Japan where gratuity isn't commonplace, leaving a tip inappropriately is almost like saying: "This business probably isn't doing well enough to pay you a proper salary, so here's a little something extra." > On the rare occasion that you actually need to give a tip in Japan, do so by putting the money inside of a tasteful, decorative envelope and seal it. The tip should be presented as more of…

There must be some different kind of worldview here.. I guess it must have something to do with coming from a tipping culture vs a non-tipping culture. If I imagine myself, in my current job, dropping by a customer and deliver the updated product, and then the customer tries to hand over a fiver. I would go, in my mind, "What? What am I supposed to do with that? Do I look like a beggar that just happened to bring the product? I have a wage, I don't need to be "supported" with breadcrumbs by someone who think he's above me. I'm not a dog." And so on. It would definitely put a sour taste on everything. And actually my company's code of ethics (we're a worldwide company) do forbid receiving anything from customers, with the exception of the occasional shared lunch.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#708
post #493
post #379

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is important to be tipping in cash to begin with. Anyone doing unskilled labor and getting tips is not likely in a position to be able to afford the income tax on those tips. Always tip in cash.

Breezing past your suggestion that workers should do some tax fraud, not reporting your tips also lowers your social security earnings which is going to lower your payouts as well.

Anyone who is doing an unskilled job that receives some component of their tips in cash is already “do[ing] some tax fraud”. Perhaps I am projecting my familiarity with the food service industry onto others; if you were not aware, this is the overwhelming norm with a rate of occurrence approaching 100%.

If you are working a laborious job and you get cash tips, they go into your pocket. Full stop. To assert otherwise is to be simply unaware of the realities. No one scraping by with cash tips is summing them for their 1040. No one.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#709
post #708
post #493

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Breezing past your suggestion that workers should do some tax fraud, not reporting your tips also lowers your social security earnings which is going to lower your payouts as well.

Anyone who is doing an unskilled job that receives some component of their tips in cash is already “do[ing] some tax fraud”. Perhaps I am projecting my familiarity with the food service industry onto others; if you were not aware, this is the overwhelming norm with a rate of occurrence approaching 100%. If you are working a laborious job and you get cash tips, they go into your pocket. Full stop. To assert otherwise…

Not everyone. I agree with you that it's very common, but an guarantee you from experience it's not 100%.

Re: Instacart paying 80 cents an hour because worker received a large tip

#710

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You all are being duped into contrived outrage. The example given in the OP link is very misleading and it is quite obviously cherry picking (to spark emotion) and is actually an outright lie. The truth is that Insticart actually pays a $10 minimum per delivery (this isn't even mentioned in the OP link) So how did this person make 80 cents an hour? The delivery was 0.7 miles and took 69 minutes. Ironically, under Ins…

What the hell does that have to do with my comment and my own experiences? I worked these jobs while trying to support and educate myself so that I could get a better-paying job. At the same time, if 6-8 hours a day of Instacart deliveries isn't enough to provide you with an apartment, tuition money and food & entertainment for a wife and two children, then it's a service that shouldn't exist and it is only propped u…

>"I worked these jobs while trying to support and educate myself so that I could get a better-paying job."

So did many of us. People are not supposed to have to support a family as a primary earner on minimum wage and they never were. According to the 2013 Bureau of Labor Statistics, full time minimum wage earners earn over the poverty line by more than $3,000 per year. Two minimum wage earners can support a family of four and live above the poverty line. Avoiding poverty is all about choices.

>"At the same time, if 6-8 hours a day of Instacart deliveries isn't enough to provide you with an apartment, tuition money and food & entertainment for a wife and two children, then it's a service that shouldn't exist and it is only propped up by investor cash."

>"Because that is what minimum wage was originally meant to provide for an individual in America, before nearly a century of propaganda and misdirection convinced people like you that someone on minimum wage is lazy and doesn't deserve enough money to eat healthily, rent a decent apartment and have enough cash for some entertainment, and generally live better than someone in a third-world country, much less afford something like an annual vacation or car payments."

You have your facts quite wrong about the minimum wage and what it was originally meant to provide. The minimum wage was first enacted in 1938 by FDR. It paid a meager 25 cents per hour (this is $4 today when adjusted for inflation). So it has become substantially more generous as time has gone on. This is the opposite of your claim.

People in third-world countries earn less than a dollar a day. I'm sure they would love to earn even the 25 cents per hour that the original minimum wage paid.

Everyone I know that has been stuck in minimum wage jobs have definitely been lazy or made very poor choices (like stealing from their employer ETC.) in fact, only 3% of people above age 25 in the US make only the minimum wage.

Get the actual facts before making biased and factually incorrect claims (and cite sources when doing so). It really hurts your credibility to just make things up and try to sound like an expert so maybe no one will call you on it and you will appear to make a valid point.

Source: https://bebusinessed.com/history/history-of-minimum-wage/

Post reply on HN