The Phone Call Is Dead
techcrunch.com
The Phone Call Is Dead
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#2However, that doesn't mean it's any good.
Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#3Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#4Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#5Such nonsense. Horrifically US-centric in dealing with a global technology, and ignoring that tone of voice carries so much information in a conversation that simply cannot be expressed well in the written word (despite the heroic attempts of some people to stick smiley faces everywhere).
Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#6Such nonsense. Horrifically US-centric in dealing with a global technology, and ignoring that tone of voice carries so much information in a conversation that simply cannot be expressed well in the written word (despite the heroic attempts of some people to stick smiley faces everywhere).
A skype call can give the same information but you can send a message first, asking if the recipient has time.
A telephone needs a couple of wires and can be powered remotely (those of you who still have basic landlines will recall that they often keep working when the power to your house is out), and is a fantastically simple technology to repair and maintain.
In some parts, mobile phones (AKA cellular phones, AKA handy phones) are leapfrogging landlines because they require even less physical hardware and maintenance - it's not the case that everyone has one; rather, someone has one and sells use of it. People use it to make voice calls.
Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#7Such nonsense. Horrifically US-centric in dealing with a global technology, and ignoring that tone of voice carries so much information in a conversation that simply cannot be expressed well in the written word (despite the heroic attempts of some people to stick smiley faces everywhere).
Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#8Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#9The decrease in paid phone calls in the teen segment is likely more than made up for by the amount of time spent on skype and msn.
Teens don't really do voice much unless SMS and IM bandwidth is too low, like planning when I'm going to drive her around (and even then she'll put in her original request in SMS). I've asked her about it - if you're doing voice, you're restricted to talking to only one person at a time.
Although my 11-year-old tends to do confcalls (one memorable night at Cub Scouts he was confcalling with friends in St. Louis and Puerto Rico... the world is so strange sometimes); I think at his age text input is just too slow.
I don't like articles of the form "The Is Dead" because they're always hyperbole - voice is still the highest-bandwidth information transfer beyond actually being face to face, and that isn't going to change for a long time. Like other communication channels, it's merely being augmented by others, but not replaced.
Re: The Phone Call Is Dead
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
A skype call can give the same information but you can send a message first, asking if the recipient has time.
This also requires a functional computer, a steady power supply for it, and an internet connection reliable enough and fast enough to handle it. In large portions of the globe, this is laughable. A telephone needs a couple of wires and can be powered remotely (those of you who still have basic landlines will recall that they often keep working when the power to your house is out), and is a fantastically simple techno…
In the western world (which is really the only part of the world where we can meaningfully talk about technology) the internet connection is usually fast enough, and smart phones are plentyfull enough that it doesn't matter.