Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 65.0 released

mozilla.org

191–200 of 422 posts

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#191
post #100

Recently switched from chromium to Firefox. Very pleased with its performance. Android Firefox demolishes chrome too but probably just because I no longer need to download and render all the ads (thanks ublock.) While I was at it I also took the chance to migrate passwords out of Google land into Bitwarden. Session restore is amazing, my .cache is tmpfs but it still manages to instantly recover all my tabs on reboot.…

Are profiles something available on vanilla Firefox (no extensions)? Thanks!

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#192
post #100

Recently switched from chromium to Firefox. Very pleased with its performance. Android Firefox demolishes chrome too but probably just because I no longer need to download and render all the ads (thanks ublock.) While I was at it I also took the chance to migrate passwords out of Google land into Bitwarden. Session restore is amazing, my .cache is tmpfs but it still manages to instantly recover all my tabs on reboot.…

Im also suprised by the firefox performance on android. Ive noticed it can render pages chrome cannot, which is so suprising considering googles investment in progressive web apps and how some of their new android go apps use chrome to render.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#193
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Choose Firefox now, or later you won't have a choice" https://robert.ocallahan.org/2014/08/choose-firefox-now-or-l...

Honestly that's a very poor rationale. People should be choosing Firefox because it's a better product or a more ethical one (sadly they are doing a poor job at convincing us of that), not because we need to keep a competitor alive forever no matter what.

Right now, it is both, it is a better product and a more ethical one.

If people will not use it for these reasons now, then they will not be able to use it in the future.

That's the argument, and it seems pretty straightforward to me.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

hmm. I upgrade my VSCode pretty much all the time they do a release because they provide a .deb file. Installing the upgrade is as simple as double-clicking on the file. I am sure pretty much all the users of Ubuntu and Debian are capable of doing a Firefox upgrade if they really wanted to. But no harm in making it easier.

I have an older friend who used Ubuntu on his laptop, as he had never used Windows and just wanted a simple web browsing capable laptop (before the days of Chromebooks) The number of times I've discovered umpteen copies of Firefox tarballs on his desktop, and every time he complains it's been a pain to 'upgrade Firefox' Sure, I could have done more handholding, but yes, Firefox could certainly have made it easier bac…

Also in my experience is always painful to have more than a version of firefox; a firefox-stable.deb and a firefox-nightly.deb would be appreciated

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#195

No changes to the interface again! Will not go back to FF till they take graphic design seriously.

As a someone who works in the design industry, I appreciate it when ‘graphic design’ takes a backseat where my browser is concerned and they just let the UI merge as discretely with the OS interface as possible...

...and from here, that's exactly what it appears to be doing!

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A scaled resolution is now default on most MacBooks. I haven't noticed battery problems but certainly seen RAM usage at least double that of Chrome and considerably above Safari.

If you are worried about battery performance, I can personally attest that Firefox is better than chrome in terms of battery performance. Still Safari is the best in terms of battery endurance (its a VERY SIGNIFICANT difference). But then again its Safari, so you have to decide whether you want a capable browser (FF/Chrome) or a battery efficient one.

Safari is my main browser when I am not working with frontend stuff and it's perfectly fine.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#197
post #91
post #11

I love Firefox and use it all the time, but for the last few years one of my biggest pains is the OSX performance on my Macbook Pro. Is this close to be resolved soon?

Regarding the other replies, I believe that Firefox is extremely slow in OS X only if you use a scaled resolution. That seems to be a known issue, but for some reason it's taking a long time to be solved.

Scaled resolution is default on most/all retina MacBooks which is unfortunate.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#198
post #106
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The pretense that all Linux users should be (or already are) technically capable is really harmful to the ecosystem. No, you should not expect Ubuntu or Debian users to figure out on their own (1) why the tar.gz file they download doesn't do anything meaningful and (2) how they will get this version of Firefox instead without any further instructions. Running Firefox from a tarball is a very specific use case for a s…

Wouldn't the average Ubuntu user be best off by getting it through the Ubuntu package repo once it's updated there? Or doesn't Ubuntu have a channel that would provide that soon by default?

Well, yes and no. I'm precluded from installing new Firefox via apt-get because my Ubuntu version fell off active support. Running a dist-upgrade is risky, and I don't feel like doing it until I know I have a spare free day to fix everything in case of a problem. A Firefox PPA would be a nice thing to use instead, for now.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#199
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Last I checked, containers weren't working properly, and I gave up on the idea because false sense of security is worse. My test website was web.whatsapp.com. I think this is the tracker, although I didn't really look too much into it ( https://github.com/mozilla/multi-account-containers/issues/8... Edit: fixed link

Have you tried that again since September 2017? I can’t seem to reproduce the issue on my machine. (By the way, the link includes an extra underscore. The correct one is https://github.com/mozilla/multi-account-containers/issues/8... )

Yes, I can still reproduce it on 64. I'm on linux though.

Re: Firefox 65.0 released

#200
post #102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Ubuntu and Debian" "average user" I dont disagree with your point, not sure it is relevant however.

The pretense that all Linux users should be (or already are) technically capable is really harmful to the ecosystem. No, you should not expect Ubuntu or Debian users to figure out on their own (1) why the tar.gz file they download doesn't do anything meaningful and (2) how they will get this version of Firefox instead without any further instructions. Running Firefox from a tarball is a very specific use case for a s…

Wouldn’t non-technical users have installed Firefox from their GUI, using the distro’s variant?

The UX of deb and of tar are equivalent, relative to a GUI.

Post reply on HN