64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
1–10 of 315 posts
Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#2Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#3Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#4Heartbreaking. I'm only partially in what could be considered tech, but I constantly try to move groups in my industry every few years to constantly pick up new skills. I honestly think I have enough random skills now: databases, programming, systems integration, mastery of a variety of common industry tools, project leadership, specific domain theory and understanding of the math that underlays my industry. However,…
Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#5However there is a 2nd lesson to be learned here. Why in the world does he not have any savings at 64? The article is scant on details, but does mention he was in the computer industry from his 20s, and raised his son, say, until roughly his 40s. That leaves 20 prime years of earning power w/o savings? Something is amiss.
To me this is the lesson learned. If you're in the IT space, live way below your means. Most of us should be earning fantastic salaries and saving it for the day when the same industry that called us "Rock Stars" dumped us as fast as one leaving their 15 minutes (read: years) of fame.
Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#6I feel for this guy. Ageism is completely real and mostly missing from D&I initiatives. However there is a 2nd lesson to be learned here. Why in the world does he not have any savings at 64? The article is scant on details, but does mention he was in the computer industry from his 20s, and raised his son, say, until roughly his 40s. That leaves 20 prime years of earning power w/o savings? Something is amiss. To me th…
That translates to: "If you're in a high paying, in demand field, save more aggressively than if you're in a low paying field with limited opportunities"
Honestly, those in the IT field should be able to get away with saving a bit below recommended levels, in part because pay is higher, in part because demand is growing with no signs of slowing down. It's all those other people who should be saving more aggressively!
Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#7Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#8Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#9Heartbreaking. I'm only partially in what could be considered tech, but I constantly try to move groups in my industry every few years to constantly pick up new skills. I honestly think I have enough random skills now: databases, programming, systems integration, mastery of a variety of common industry tools, project leadership, specific domain theory and understanding of the math that underlays my industry. However,…
The problem with tech is that if you did something just a few years ago you are considered "outdated" and this experience doesn't count. For example I wrote heavy duty C++ code until 2012 for more than 10 years but during interviews I often get zero credit for this experience. "You haven't used C++ 17".
Re: 64 and unemployed: One man's struggle to be taken seriously as a job applicant
#10I feel for this guy. Ageism is completely real and mostly missing from D&I initiatives. However there is a 2nd lesson to be learned here. Why in the world does he not have any savings at 64? The article is scant on details, but does mention he was in the computer industry from his 20s, and raised his son, say, until roughly his 40s. That leaves 20 prime years of earning power w/o savings? Something is amiss. To me th…