Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
11–20 of 164 posts
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#12Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#13> Dropbox snares HelloSign (YC W11) for $230 The title appears to have a negative slant. Is the modern jargon for acquisitions of this nature?
However, I agree with you: “offers to buy” would be more neutral and feel more appropriate. “Snares” has other nuances (surprise, violence, asymmetry) but neither convey a discussed at length, mutually agreed and beneficial relationship.
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#14> Dropbox snares HelloSign (YC W11) for $230 The title appears to have a negative slant. Is the modern jargon for acquisitions of this nature?
I interpreted it as Dropbox was fortunate to acquire HelloSign.
Also, this may just be some creative writing. Dropbox’s announcement did not use such language.
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#15There's something I never understood about e-signature services: how are they legally binding? Why do we need them at all? The end users don't have control over any of the keys, so it all hinges on the e-signature service telling the truth. It's significantly less secure than say, S/MIME with a proper CA-signed certificate. Is the bar for legal "signatures" really that low?
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#16There's something I never understood about e-signature services: how are they legally binding? Why do we need them at all? The end users don't have control over any of the keys, so it all hinges on the e-signature service telling the truth. It's significantly less secure than say, S/MIME with a proper CA-signed certificate. Is the bar for legal "signatures" really that low?
The reason you sign something is to show clear intent that you intended to agree to something.
Nobody’s under the impression a paper signature cannot be forged either. It’s no different.
It’s social not mathematical.
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#17There's something I never understood about e-signature services: how are they legally binding? Why do we need them at all? The end users don't have control over any of the keys, so it all hinges on the e-signature service telling the truth. It's significantly less secure than say, S/MIME with a proper CA-signed certificate. Is the bar for legal "signatures" really that low?
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#18There's something I never understood about e-signature services: how are they legally binding? Why do we need them at all? The end users don't have control over any of the keys, so it all hinges on the e-signature service telling the truth. It's significantly less secure than say, S/MIME with a proper CA-signed certificate. Is the bar for legal "signatures" really that low?
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#19Hmm... the headline has me wondering what was the first time one YC startup bought another YC startup. Is this the first time? Or has it happened before?
Re: Dropbox buys HelloSign (YC W11) for $230M
#20> Dropbox snares HelloSign (YC W11) for $230 The title appears to have a negative slant. Is the modern jargon for acquisitions of this nature?