Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#2(2005)
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#3Needs: [2005]
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#4Including this one?
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#5Including this one?
Since I've seen this paper mentioned a few times now on several different sites and heard varying replies, I'd be very interested in informed opinions about this. I've taken a look at it but don't consider my skill level in statistics high enough to assess the paper on my own.
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#6Including this one?
Can you elaborate as to why? Snark is not really the goal here.
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#7Including this one?
If this publication is false, its premise is true, which would mean the publication is true?
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#8Including this one?
Isn't this just applying a model (i.e. it's not empirical, just theoretical)?
Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#9Re: Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you elaborate as to why? Snark is not really the goal here.
> Can you elaborate as to why? How can I elaborate on answer that I don't have?
I think just your first post is a snappy reply to the headline, but doesn't seem to address the content of the paper in any way, so I was interested in your specific thoughts about the content of the paper.