Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don’t think the analysis is that difficult. Imagine that the interstates were only used for military transportation (both for emergencies, which presumably haven’t happened much, and for regular logistics). Surely the ongoing maintenance costs would be vastly reduced. Those costs would be the costs that “we the people” accept as valid usage of taxpayer money. You could throw in costs for other public interests like…
Practically speaking you’d be shifting the burden from the people who can afford it, to people who can’t. I see similar arguments from people who resent paying into social security and other things. It seems to be a combination of ideological convictions, lack of empathy, and unawareness of why these kind of measures were created in the first place. Ignoring all of rhe knock-on effects of a massive road network and i…
In other words, I question the premise that federal interstates reduce the cost of freight if you include the environmental externalities.