Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I think programmers tend to underestimate the difficulties involved with becoming a good programmer because once you're good, you only see the even steeper learning curve ahead of you. Good programmers I know also overestimate the skill needed to earn high salary in this job. You don't have to go up the learning curve much; these days, you just learn yourself JS a little bit and go for a webdev job, making shit cod…
> Nah, that's like wondering why is this ice block sitting on a hot plate and still solid. The answer is: because it just got put there, and it'll melt in a moment. So too, will end high salaries, as most low-hanging fruits get eaten by software, made by mass-produced cohort of programmers. Our industry has its share of cycles, but this, in my view, is largely wishful thinking on the part of people. Nothing wrong wit…
Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
261–270 of 407 posts
Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#262Earlier quoted context omitted.
On the side of the employees, unions have proven themselves to be good means to improve the situation for employees. Here in Germany they definitely have helped in many industries. My comment was more about the companies though which may form cartels to drive down employee wages. Companies forming cartels is illegal, while unions are legal in many places.
Unions are basically legalized price fixing. What happens is that the union negotiate a "fair" price, and then all companies decide to pay no more than said "fair" price. See for example (original is in Swedish): https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https...
I suspect your posting in bad faith here and in the usa SAG minimum rates doesn't effect the higher rates that successful actors get.
Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#263Earlier quoted context omitted.
Let's put it another way: we are looking at the top 1% of software engineers. Is it surprising that they have incomes in the 1% range? For comparison, in Amazon, Senior and above engineers count for ~20% of the total, and those are the ones pulling +300k regularly. So only the top 20% of one of the top companies are getting such compensation. And to follow the article, this won't last forever. Whenever the next stock…
> Whenever the next stock market crash comes, almost half of that compensation (the equity based one) will almost vanish. You're saying the value of (for example) Google stock will plummet to 10% or less and then not recover at all over the following few years?
I don't think a 90% drop is common, but I also don't think it's outrageous.
Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#264Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anything good programmers are underpaid. If you are making your company a mil, you should be getting 1/2.
Sales people don't get anywhere near that kind of commission. Most SWEs I know are not making more than they bring in profit.
Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#265Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#266four ppl from my extended family have quit their jobs and joined "code school" to become programmers this year. None of them have any programming background.
I did that once. It was great. Got me to my dream job (spoilers: I do not write code for a living).
Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#267Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#268Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#269Earlier quoted context omitted.
If anything good programmers are underpaid. If you are making your company a mil, you should be getting 1/2.
I'm all for programmers getting paid more. However, by your logic, if the company is losing money, should programmers contribute from their own pockets to keep the company afloat? Starting your own company (not self employed contractor) gives a really good perspective on what it means to be owner and employee.
The logic is that programmers tend to produce far more value than they capture -- so that gets captured elsewhere, a lot of it typically by management. Except the value can be hard to quantify when the company is old and so is the software, how much of the value is employee #3701 making fixing a bug that's making the product not work for one customer in one instance vs employees #107, #85, and #150 who in their past team's life created the original version of that system to begin with to make the new customer even consider using it? There's no point to moaning about how much you "should" get paid. Just ask for more if you feel underpaid, but be aware that because of competition and because people usually want to hear what more you'll do to justify it, you're not going to always get it.
Re: Are We in the Middle of a Programming Bubble?
#270I think programmers tend to underestimate the difficulties involved with becoming a good programmer because once you're good, you only see the even steeper learning curve ahead of you. Some of the smartest people I know work in other domains: biology, chemistry, and even physics. They are sometimes baffled by tasks that seem trivial to me, and I'm under no impression that I'm more intelligent than them. I simply spec…
My kids have mentioned that they might be interested in a degree in computer science because and I've encouraged them to combine that with a second area of specialization. Programmers are everywhere, but a programmer that also knows chemistry or biology or economics or art history or just about anything stands out.