41–50 of 79 posts
Facebook already has access to a larger repository of photos going back over a decade and all the years inbetween along with decent face recognition to create a much bigger dataset than resorting to a hashtag challenge. But I guess that wouldn't be newsworthy.
Their "how old" facial analysis app has been around a few years and is remarkably accurate.
Facebook already has access to a larger repository of photos going back over a decade and all the years inbetween along with decent face recognition to create a much bigger dataset than resorting to a hashtag challenge. But I guess that wouldn't be newsworthy.
Facebook already has access to a larger repository of photos going back over a decade and all the years inbetween along with decent face recognition to create a much bigger dataset than resorting to a hashtag challenge. But I guess that wouldn't be newsworthy. This was addressed in the article: In various versions of the meme, people were instructed to post their first profile picture alongside their current profile…
Facebook already has access to a larger repository of photos going back over a decade and all the years inbetween along with decent face recognition to create a much bigger dataset than resorting to a hashtag challenge. But I guess that wouldn't be newsworthy.
Facebook already has access to a larger repository of photos going back over a decade and all the years inbetween along with decent face recognition to create a much bigger dataset than resorting to a hashtag challenge. But I guess that wouldn't be newsworthy. This was addressed in the article: In various versions of the meme, people were instructed to post their first profile picture alongside their current profile…
Also, people tag themselves all the time, and if you upload a photo with people, you can tell quickly that they already identify people with high accuracy, because they suggest tags for you.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
As has been pointed out, people identifying themselves makes it easier to figure out which 10-year-old and current photos are actually: * themselves * 10 years old
And of course no one would lie about it!
https://globalnews.ca/news/4855500/facebook-10-year-challeng... https://twitter.com/facebook/status/1085675097766031360?ref_... and rebuttal. I know that Facebook's actions mean that it no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt but this seems like a non story that someone really wants to be a story. Thinking about it lest say 10,000 people respond, is that even enough data to move the needle? Which photo do you use…
Cleanup is standard work for any dataset. With enough money and a pile of Indians working for cheap hourly rates you can clean through A LOT of data. 10,000? Try a million!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cleanup is standard work for any dataset. With enough money and a pile of Indians working for cheap hourly rates you can clean through A LOT of data. 10,000? Try a million!
Why do they need to be Indian? Sure the data would reflect that a plurality of global low wage workers are from India, but there are also plenty of low wage workers who are not ethnically Indian or geographically based in India (such as all of the Americans working on r/beermoney).
Google Photos has been able to track my goddaughter from literally her first photo (when she looked like an alien) to now (5 years later), with about 2 photos per year.
The subtle point here is that people have became so suspicious of these platforms that everything they do is observed with a sharper eye on privacy, speaking of which... I wonder how Portal is doing?
Facebook already has access to a larger repository of photos going back over a decade and all the years inbetween along with decent face recognition to create a much bigger dataset than resorting to a hashtag challenge. But I guess that wouldn't be newsworthy.
It seems, at least, Microsoft is way beyond needing a 10-year challenge training dataset. Their "how old" facial analysis app has been around a few years and is remarkably accurate. https://www.how-old.net/