> If he understands it then why does he think it's "odd" for her to have a white male husband?
It's odd for someone to be racist against whites when they're married to one; whining about white privilege _is racism_. Hating on whites is racism. Judging individuals by the color of their skin, and claiming they have privilege because of it, is racism.
> When you're talking about abusive behavior online, and you describe the individuals that leveled the most abusive behavior at you, that's not "whining" or "racist".
They weren't online, they were in a classroom, his teacher chose an extremely left TED talk by a women whining about white privilege because she'd been abused by bad men. They didn't abuse her because they're white, but because they're abusers. Blaming white privilege for their behavior most certainly is racism.
> I'm happy to call it "majority privilege" if you want. I'm not sure how you think it's not a bad thing for certain races to get treated better than others, though. (Different ones depending on what area you're in.)
It's not a bad thing for the majority to be what society optimizes for; it's not privilege, it's how cultures work.
> What beliefs?
Your belief in "white privilege".
> "The story had to have some kind of genders for the characters"? "It's not a horrible choice to pick the most common genders involved in adult sexual abuse[0]"? "It's possible to design a character with non-political motives"?
Making your students write a story about a man trying to rape a woman is an unnecessary vulgarity in a writing class, it's nothing more than the teacher trying to impose her left'y political views about white privilege onto students. There's a thousand other less political things they could have been asked to write about that were serve the goal of learning to write just as well.