Is "Docker D un (beta)" the intended page title?
Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
21–30 of 36 posts
Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#22Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#23It's a bit like https://zeit.co/now without the CLI that builds and pushes the images.
Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#24I presume the domain name is a violation of the Docker trademark, seeing as it could potentially be confused for an official product (as it uses the Docker name)
[1] https://www.zopyx.com/andreas-jung/contents/dont-use-docker-...
Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#25Doesn't seem very sustainable, what's the business model?
The same as Heroku, provide docker-based PaaS and users would pay for their containers.
Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#26Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#27Re: Show HN: docker-run.com enables to “docker run” in the clould with a subdomain
#28I presume the domain name is a violation of the Docker trademark, seeing as it could potentially be confused for an official product (as it uses the Docker name)
Given that they warned against using it in repos and even Twitter handles [1], it’d be a wise choice to use some other name. [1] https://www.zopyx.com/andreas-jung/contents/dont-use-docker-...