There seems to be an even more effective solution to closed journals than just telling scientists that if they take money their paper needs to be in an open journal. Also tell them that when they apply for funding only scientific research which is available in open journals will be considered. You'd then get people not only submitting new research in open journals, but making all their backlog available as well to in…
Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
61–70 of 128 posts
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#62Not too long ago, I had communications with Elsevier's technology team, and through that experience, I also spoke with some of their directors. Let me say that the experience was kind of mind-boggling and surreal. My impression is that Elsevier is a company locked into the past by a couple of decades. The leadership that I spoke with seemed to have worked in publishing for a very long time. And, probably because of t…
Who reads all these journals? Let alone pay for them...
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#63I'm working on something that would VERY much benefit from open access journals:
With Polar you maintain all your research in one place and can annotate and share with other users.
One thing I want to add is the ability to sync up with open access sources to fetch PDFs, get metadata for them, find related PDFs and research, etc.
Going to go heads down into this today.
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the most part, researchers would prefer to publish open access, and agree with your stance about public money 100%, but with the current state of things, it would have a negative effect on their careers. You have to publish in certain highly-regarded journals to advance. In some countries this is basically enshrined in law: there's a big table of journals ranked from high to low, and you need a certain number of…
Wow, seriously? Which countries?
http://blog.boletsis.net/level-1-level-2-publications-norweg...
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#65Not too long ago, I had communications with Elsevier's technology team, and through that experience, I also spoke with some of their directors. Let me say that the experience was kind of mind-boggling and surreal. My impression is that Elsevier is a company locked into the past by a couple of decades. The leadership that I spoke with seemed to have worked in publishing for a very long time. And, probably because of t…
Who reads all these journals? Let alone pay for them...
I really do not want to know how much we are paying for that.
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#66Not too long ago, I had communications with Elsevier's technology team, and through that experience, I also spoke with some of their directors. Let me say that the experience was kind of mind-boggling and surreal. My impression is that Elsevier is a company locked into the past by a couple of decades. The leadership that I spoke with seemed to have worked in publishing for a very long time. And, probably because of t…
That's an understatement.
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#67Aaron Schwartz would be pleased to see this. Elsevier, Springer etc. are just syndicates sitting between researchers and consumers. They have no place in today's world.
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#68Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#69This is awesome. I'm working on something that would VERY much benefit from open access journals: https://getpolarized.io/ With Polar you maintain all your research in one place and can annotate and share with other users. One thing I want to add is the ability to sync up with open access sources to fetch PDFs, get metadata for them, find related PDFs and research, etc. Going to go heads down into this today.
Re: Elsevier journal editors resign, start rival open-access journal
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
For the most part, researchers would prefer to publish open access, and agree with your stance about public money 100%, but with the current state of things, it would have a negative effect on their careers. You have to publish in certain highly-regarded journals to advance. In some countries this is basically enshrined in law: there's a big table of journals ranked from high to low, and you need a certain number of…
Wow, seriously? Which countries?
Pretty much any developed country. Research funding is guided by metrics and publishing is a very strong component. As anyone can create their own personal journal, only the leading and established ones count.