Live data from Hacker News

The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

earther.gizmodo.com

11–20 of 132 posts

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#11
post #7

> In fact, the study concluded that for every liter of freshwater a plant produces, 0.4 gallons (1.5 liters) of brine are produced on average. How does removing water from solution makes more of that solution?

For every 2.5 liters seawater, the products are 1 liter fresh water and 1.5 liters of brine.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#12

> this salty-ass junk Do you mean sea water? The amount of fresh water the human race will extract from the oceans will be what fraction of a percentage point of the total? Not accounting for, of course, the fact that most of it will make its way back to the oceans. If pumping it back in has a local effect, then by all means try to mitigate that. But the idea that we're producing 'toxic waste' by creating saltier sea…

"While most studies focus on salinity as the primary cause of biological effects, many chemicals are used in the desalination process (e.g. antiscalants, biocides, etc.), some of which can be toxic."[1]

[1] https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ocean/d...

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#13
post #7

> In fact, the study concluded that for every liter of freshwater a plant produces, 0.4 gallons (1.5 liters) of brine are produced on average. How does removing water from solution makes more of that solution?

That's a good point, but I assume what they meant is that to output 1 liter of fresh water, the plant needs to process ~2.5 liters.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#14

> this salty-ass junk Do you mean sea water? The amount of fresh water the human race will extract from the oceans will be what fraction of a percentage point of the total? Not accounting for, of course, the fact that most of it will make its way back to the oceans. If pumping it back in has a local effect, then by all means try to mitigate that. But the idea that we're producing 'toxic waste' by creating saltier sea…

I know it's not generally accepted on HN to say "please read the article before commenting on the article." But it's worth noting that the contents and effect of the "brine" as distinct from "sea water" get two full paragraphs devoted to them in the article.

Maybe let's not attack the journalist.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#15

> this salty-ass junk Do you mean sea water? The amount of fresh water the human race will extract from the oceans will be what fraction of a percentage point of the total? Not accounting for, of course, the fact that most of it will make its way back to the oceans. If pumping it back in has a local effect, then by all means try to mitigate that. But the idea that we're producing 'toxic waste' by creating saltier sea…

This isn't absurd at all. Sea water contains lots of components, not just salt. Many are non-toxic at their current concentration; if you remove the water and pump in the rest into the ocean, you're potentially increasing the concentration enough to make it toxic. It is quite literally toxic waste. And the journalist did you the favor of linking to scientific research that says the same thing.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#16
post #7

> In fact, the study concluded that for every liter of freshwater a plant produces, 0.4 gallons (1.5 liters) of brine are produced on average. How does removing water from solution makes more of that solution?

I guess, it's more "X gallons of sea water result in Y gallons of drinkable water and Z gallons of brine", where Y=1.0, Z=1.5 and X >= Y + Z.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#17
Stupid question: Being that a large fraction of the problematic plants seem to exist close to or within desert countries, couldn't you simply pump it into the desert? I figure, if you find an appropriate area, you'll have not much of an ecosystem to destroy anyway and the area could eventually function as an enormous evaporation pond.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#18
post #15

> this salty-ass junk Do you mean sea water? The amount of fresh water the human race will extract from the oceans will be what fraction of a percentage point of the total? Not accounting for, of course, the fact that most of it will make its way back to the oceans. If pumping it back in has a local effect, then by all means try to mitigate that. But the idea that we're producing 'toxic waste' by creating saltier sea…

This isn't absurd at all. Sea water contains lots of components, not just salt. Many are non-toxic at their current concentration ; if you remove the water and pump in the rest into the ocean, you're potentially increasing the concentration enough to make it toxic. It is quite literally toxic waste. And the journalist did you the favor of linking to scientific research that says the same thing.

"at their current concentration"

So the solution is obvious. Mix 1 part brine with X parts seawater before releasing. Oceans are big, so X can be a very large number, if that is necessary.

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#19
It’s saying for every 2.5L of seawater only 1L of freshwater is recovered and the rest is brine, which also includes chemical byproducts.

Why is this ratio so bad? What would it take to recover more water and produce more concentrated waste that could be managed differently?

Re: The Dirty Truth About Turning Seawater into Drinking Water

#20
post #17

Stupid question: Being that a large fraction of the problematic plants seem to exist close to or within desert countries, couldn't you simply pump it into the desert? I figure, if you find an appropriate area, you'll have not much of an ecosystem to destroy anyway and the area could eventually function as an enormous evaporation pond.

If you're wanting to make fresh water there, it's probably because people do actually live there and want to do other stuff there, so any method of polluting the environment is going to have negative consequences.

For example if they are extracting fresh water from seawater, they are probably also already using groundwater as well which your proposal would pollute.

Post reply on HN