Earlier quoted context omitted.
I read somewhere that stolen works of art are used as a form of currency between drug crime Organisations
Doesn't make a ton of sense. If you can't convert it to currency easily, why does it have value at all?
An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
21–28 of 28 posts
Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#22Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
On a national basis, the top 1% in the US don't have enough money to finance bespoke art heists (nor can they generally afford black market museum pieces). So it's probably not them :)...maybe the top 0.1% or 0.01% could. Whenever I think about this particular topic, I come to the conclusion that there must be much more nuance to it. I assume the pieces are eventually sold outside of the United States, maybe to oliga…
Do you realize that the top .1% is also part of the top 1%?
Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#24Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#25Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#26What I find pretty amazing about this theft and the theft from the Isabella Stewart Gardner museum in Boston is that the pieces stolen can't be resold on the open market. Whomever is paying for these thefts, can only sell to discreet private buyers (who then can't display them openly without risking being caught). The economics of it are fascinating. A collector is paying someone to steal artwork, which then becomes…
Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Only if you do as well. Also, I don't think that word means what you think it means. https://www.dictionary.com/browse/unsubstantive
From the link you gave: substantive adjective 7. of considerable amount or quantity. 8. possessing substance; having practical importance, value, or effect I bet that's what dang had in mind about your comment.
Re: An Andy Warhol Artwork Was Stolen and Never Seen Again
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
From the link you gave: substantive adjective 7. of considerable amount or quantity. 8. possessing substance; having practical importance, value, or effect I bet that's what dang had in mind about your comment.
Which none of dang's comments have. Dang is a mod who breaks the rules every day and calls people out on them. This is fair to you?
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17494243
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16080800
https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme...