Earlier quoted context omitted.
>For some staff, teaching is clearly something they _have_ to do and effort is put in appropriately. Well yes, of course. People don't go into academia because they want to teach. Academics are also not rewarded significantly for good teaching.
>Well yes, of course. People don't go into academia because they want to teach. Academics are also not rewarded significantly for good teaching. When student tuition fees make up the bulk of a department's income, is this reasonable and fair to students? Are they getting value for money? Some institutions have separate teaching and research promotion tracks mapped to equivalent salary grades.
It's difficult to say, isn't it? How does one determine how much a university education "should" cost?
I don't see any easy solution. If we convert research-focused universities into teaching-focused institutions, what happens to the research? If we create new and separate teaching-focused institutions, who pays?