Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
1–10 of 93 posts
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#2This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#3This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
Do facial recognition systems retrain themselves to compensate for change caused by growth or age?
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#4This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
Do facial recognition systems retrain themselves to compensate for change caused by growth or age?
Random side-fact: a co-worker who climbs a lot stopped using fingerprint sensors on his phones because his prints change frequently enough due to climbing, that it's basically useless.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#5This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
I've already seen some magic tricks similar to this with some small HD cameras.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#6This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
Do facial recognition systems retrain themselves to compensate for change caused by growth or age?
Apple claims their FaceID system does, at least.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#7This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
Richard Turner, self-styled card mechanic, can count and manipulate cards with unbelievable precision by feel alone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwFIJyWKs1k
He also happens to be blind.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#8This small radard is sensitive enough to identify playing cards by looking at the tiny texture. Looking forward to seeing magicians using this in card tricks. Face ID with hyper sensitive radard should also be very accurate.
Do facial recognition systems retrain themselves to compensate for change caused by growth or age?
Google Photos was able to determine that pictures of my niece as an infant, and pictures of my niece as a 5 year old, are pictures of the same person.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do facial recognition systems retrain themselves to compensate for change caused by growth or age?
Random side-fact: a co-worker who climbs a lot stopped using fingerprint sensors on his phones because his prints change frequently enough due to climbing, that it's basically useless.
Many years ago I had to clock in and out of a job with a fingerprint scanner. I had the same issue because I played acoustic guitar a lot and had thick calluses on my fingers that would occasionally crack.
Re: Google’s Project Soli radar is sensitive enough to count sheets of paper
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do facial recognition systems retrain themselves to compensate for change caused by growth or age?
Google Photos was able to determine that pictures of my niece as an infant, and pictures of my niece as a 5 year old, are pictures of the same person.
I've noticed this competency in google photos as well. Though surely it is using the photos of her in between those ages to extrapolate(?)