Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you link to where they say that? I would figure someone doing something so helpful for users would at least document it. There's no reason to be surreptitious when doing such a favor. One wonders if they'll start offering a LinkedIn AntiVirus download with such an altruistic approach towards protecting users from what they have installed.
I think you're misunderstanding. LinkedIn isn't protecting the people with the extensions installed; they're protecting users FROM the people with the extensions.
How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
21–30 of 113 posts
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#22The repo says "A look at how LinkedIn spies on its users" I'm not convinced this is LinkedIn spying on users... rather, it's them protecting its users from the spammy people using these extensions. There's not a single extensions on that list that doesn't result in someone getting an unsolicited email.
Here's the full list; they're all spammy recruiting/sales extensions (nothing legit like uBlock or LastPass): daxtra SalesloftProspector SalesLoftCadence discoverly Ecquire Ebstabullhorn EbstaSalesforce ProspectHive talentbin Entelo Nimble amazinghiring colabo extension StepWells(colabo) found.ly datananas Linkedin-Hubspot Connector dux-soup(fixed) data Scraper aevy Lusha Lead Generator Candidate.ai Email Hunter Pros…
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think you're misunderstanding. LinkedIn isn't protecting the people with the extensions installed; they're protecting users FROM the people with the extensions.
Ah, as an anti-scraper/anti-bot method, every user has all these local network requests made? Maybe it's the true reason, maybe not. Transparency is key here to assume anything more than the worst. Of course any of the rest of us with a modicum of smarts would just side load a custom extension via CLI args (or we'd just browser automate, headless if not detected). Even given the most generous justification, it reeks…
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, as an anti-scraper/anti-bot method, every user has all these local network requests made? Maybe it's the true reason, maybe not. Transparency is key here to assume anything more than the worst. Of course any of the rest of us with a modicum of smarts would just side load a custom extension via CLI args (or we'd just browser automate, headless if not detected). Even given the most generous justification, it reeks…
I think it's a cat and mouse game. The more that Linkedin publishes about their anti-spam techniques, the more information spammers have to try to evade those anti-spam techniques.
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#25The repo says "A look at how LinkedIn spies on its users" I'm not convinced this is LinkedIn spying on users... rather, it's them protecting its users from the spammy people using these extensions. There's not a single extensions on that list that doesn't result in someone getting an unsolicited email.
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#26Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#27The repo says "A look at how LinkedIn spies on its users" I'm not convinced this is LinkedIn spying on users... rather, it's them protecting its users from the spammy people using these extensions. There's not a single extensions on that list that doesn't result in someone getting an unsolicited email.
Here's the full list; they're all spammy recruiting/sales extensions (nothing legit like uBlock or LastPass): daxtra SalesloftProspector SalesLoftCadence discoverly Ecquire Ebstabullhorn EbstaSalesforce ProspectHive talentbin Entelo Nimble amazinghiring colabo extension StepWells(colabo) found.ly datananas Linkedin-Hubspot Connector dux-soup(fixed) data Scraper aevy Lusha Lead Generator Candidate.ai Email Hunter Pros…
That's a malware, isn't it?
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#28Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#29[deleted]
Re: How LinkedIn detects browser extensions
#30[deleted]