The ridiculous hypocrisy of the "official" wikileaks organization sending out a document labeled "CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION NOT FOR PUBLICATION."
Perhaps they wrote this label with the intent of the document being published?
Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
11–20 of 227 posts
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#12> Contrary to false reports, his cat hasn't even been at embassy since well before the inunction was filed
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#13Overall such statement leaves bad taste. But pressure to be first or negligence makes media publish press releases without looking at them. Maybe starting it this way would make someone think about its content and not just put on their website?
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#14The ridiculous hypocrisy of the "official" wikileaks organization sending out a document labeled "CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION NOT FOR PUBLICATION."
Perhaps they wrote this label with the intent of the document being published?
That's exactly what I was thinking as well. Nobody would have published this super interesting and long list, if it was like "wikileaks complaining about stuff".
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#15The ridiculous hypocrisy of the "official" wikileaks organization sending out a document labeled "CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION NOT FOR PUBLICATION."
Isn't this something that Assange should be releasing personally, anyway? Feels a little weird for him to have his org do his dirty work. An org that claims such objectivity.
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#16[deleted]
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#17The mainstream press complaining about someone deliberately omitting facts from what they report. That's very ironic.
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#18I have always love wikileaks for what they do. It is very sad to see that there is so much wrong information and it makes me believe that there is indeed a smear campaign against Julian Assange and wilileaks.
If anything, can't but help feel that WikiLeaks informed how the ICIJ handled the leaked 11.5 million leaked documents that comprised the 'Panama Papers.' The involvement of multiple journalists, across different organisations, really adds authenticity that the information was handled objectively and fairly. There's been very little criticism of that fact, at least when compared to WikiLeak's handling of other materials.
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#19It is sad to see how low WikiLeaks has fallen, and makes me think more and more that there has never been much of WL beyond Assange himself. It has reached comical levels of insanity, illusion of grandeur and narcissism.
WikiLeaks has almost certainly been compromised by global intelligence agencies and is operating as a front.
But the real question is: has Assange/WL ever been any different? Has it ever not been a tool sponsored/handled by some intelligence agency?
Re: Things You Can’t Say About Assange or WikiLeaks
#20The ridiculous hypocrisy of the "official" wikileaks organization sending out a document labeled "CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL COMMUNICATION NOT FOR PUBLICATION."
Isn't this something that Assange should be releasing personally, anyway? Feels a little weird for him to have his org do his dirty work. An org that claims such objectivity.
Multiple news agencies have reported that the Ecuadorians cut off his Internet access in the spring of 2018, after unspecified or wildly speculated-upon "misbehavior" by Assange.