I'm doing a bullshit job¹ and would be happy to find anything meaningful that still pays ok². Other than that I'm trying to reduce work days to work on side projects. If I had more choice I'd choose things that interest and fascinate me anyways and serve some good. This would be (socially beneficial) science and empowering information tools for the web. ¹ https://strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/ ² Need a product manager…
Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
51–60 of 460 posts
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#52You did not say how old you are, how long you think you have left, or if you are wealthy already.
For me it comes down to a question of what pays the best (or has the realistic potential to pay the most in the near-to-medium term) for my current or near-to-medium term skills. I need money to live my life and do things that are meanginful and important to me and my family. Selfish? perhaps. But I live a very comfortable & happy life with a very easy but well-paid 9-5 job and can now donate large sums of money to charities and people who want to do more useful things in many different fields (i.e. more than a single person could ever devote their attention to) - to quote Homer Simpson: Money can be exchanged for goods and services.
Money makes the world go around as they say, so IMO it is worth finding the function that maximises that.
If money is equal between what you want vs what you feel you should, go with what you want vs what you feel is the most important.
The reason I say that is that what feels most important now (e.g. you mention healthcare) may not still be important in the middle-term, so you might work on something you dont like but feel is worthy, only to have that problem "solved" by someone else at some point in the future, leaving you with a load of wasted time and regrets about being morally-worthy and "sacrificing" your career/life on something you did not actually enjoy or want to do but that you felt someone-really-ought-to-be-doing-this, but then ultimately you and your work is now effectively redundant because someone else did it better/cheaper/faster.
E.g. take computer vision. People have been working with LIDAR and things like depth perception algorithms and all sorts of stuff for years and years and years (think OpenCV et al) in an effort to make computers "see", then out of seemingly nowhere deep learning and CNNs come along and now pretty much anyone with a graphics card can train up a network in a weekend that out-performs decades of research into "traditional" computer vision techniques. With healthcare I can only imagine that this is worse - you could spend years working on a treatment for something, only for a cheaper/better one to come out from a competitor and make your work worthless, or some breakthrough to open up a more promising area of research again making your work worthless.
tl;dr - YMMV, I think its ok to be selfish in what you chose to work on. Trust your gut. If you want to work on Healthcare go for it, but if you want to work on something else than that is ok too.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#532. If the first thing is too hard - e.g. few novelists can live off their writings -, don't despair. Keep your passion as a hobby, find a stable source of income and have fun.
Assuming that you're still somewhat young, here is one additional advice from someone who has made a mistake in that respect: The older you grow, the more important financial security will become. You may think you're immune to this effect, but you're not. You'll want to have a fairly decent, constant stream of income when you're 40+, no matter what you think about that now.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Question to anyone reading this: What is your answer to "if you weren't working on it, this problem would not get solved"?
I'll skip over what I'm actively working on because I think this deserves a mention: I'm a hobbyist digital archivist. This is something where most people can likely make a meaningful and long-lasting impact, that nobody else could if they didn't. Archiving, for me, is a way of travelling forward in time. Think about "time capsules" and what not. Here's what I mean by this: If you write a message on a piece of paper,…
Recently added OCR to the process, which makes retrieval a joy.
I have no logical reason for doing this, it feels like a compulsion.
Why do you do it and what tools do you use?
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#55I'm doing a bullshit job¹ and would be happy to find anything meaningful that still pays ok². Other than that I'm trying to reduce work days to work on side projects. If I had more choice I'd choose things that interest and fascinate me anyways and serve some good. This would be (socially beneficial) science and empowering information tools for the web. ¹ https://strikemag.org/bullshit-jobs/ ² Need a product manager…
I am one of those bullshit jobs deniers. Would you like to explain why your job is bullshit? Feel free to change details to protect your privacy.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#56Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#57Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#58Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#59I'm all for egalitarianism in the public sphere, but in private I still believe that there's such a thing as natural born talent. Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. But if your goal is to maximize your output having already accepted that your time on earth is limited, then the wise thing is to probably steer in directions that have high impact but for you feel dispropor…
> Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. I seriously doubt that. People who have no aptitude in a field, even if they are dedicated, will be competing vs people who are also dedicated, but have the aptitude. I'd say maybe that "almost anyone can reach top 50% of most non-athletic fields", but definitely not top 5%.
Now consider a niche sport, say Ultimate Frisbee. I would guess that much less than 350 million people even know the rules. So invest an hour to learn the rules and play it a little with your friends. Voila, you are in the top 5%. And that is for an athletic sport.
You are probably talking about 5% of the people actively doing it like being registered in an association. In this case, 50% sounds more realistic to me.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#60When you pose the question to yourself in that manner you’ll find that both personalities tend to agree with each other and set you in the right direction for what Ray Dallio terms “regret minimization strategy”