You could alternatively pick something that is not quite so fashionable. Eg the food system, which will require very serious attention, and perhaps have at least as much environmental impact as energy. There seem to be many areas in need of improvement, including distribution, waste handling, economics/politics/equality, arresting/reducing land use, innovating more sustainable tastes, innovating production; synthetic meat, dairy, juices, pulps, hydro-/aero-ponics, self-contained fish farms, etc.
Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
41–50 of 460 posts
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#42I wouldn't argue except you said energy is something you want to work on. Better low-carbon energy is one of the most important needs on the planet right now. Solar is coming along well but fully decarbonizing needs solutions that are a long way from production, like much better storage, advanced nuclear, etc.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#43It really depends on what you did before but green renewable energy sounds interesting to me (who to some extent works in healthcare :-).
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#44I'm all for egalitarianism in the public sphere, but in private I still believe that there's such a thing as natural born talent. Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. But if your goal is to maximize your output having already accepted that your time on earth is limited, then the wise thing is to probably steer in directions that have high impact but for you feel dispropor…
Question to anyone reading this: What is your answer to "if you weren't working on it, this problem would not get solved"?
Archiving, for me, is a way of travelling forward in time. Think about "time capsules" and what not.
Here's what I mean by this: If you write a message on a piece of paper, and read it the next day, your message has successfully traveled forward in time by a day. But as the days pass, the message's survival chances diminish greatly.
The goal of archiving is to give information the highest chances possible to travel forward in time, as long as possible. It's hard to evaluate how good our chances are now, but 2000 years from now, if archaeologists find information on our current society, is it more likely to be the piece of paper you wrote, or an archive that was given the best chances of survival?
It's extremely rewarding and it truly is meaningful. Archive anything. Sort and order it, index it, describe it, upload it. Do it for something you work on. The odds for you to archive something that was not done by anyone else are very high.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#45(transcript : http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html)
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#46If you were going to be Elon Musk, you wouldn't be asking us for advice.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#47I'm all for egalitarianism in the public sphere, but in private I still believe that there's such a thing as natural born talent. Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. But if your goal is to maximize your output having already accepted that your time on earth is limited, then the wise thing is to probably steer in directions that have high impact but for you feel dispropor…
I seriously doubt that. People who have no aptitude in a field, even if they are dedicated, will be competing vs people who are also dedicated, but have the aptitude. I'd say maybe that "almost anyone can reach top 50% of most non-athletic fields", but definitely not top 5%.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#48I'm all for egalitarianism in the public sphere, but in private I still believe that there's such a thing as natural born talent. Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. But if your goal is to maximize your output having already accepted that your time on earth is limited, then the wise thing is to probably steer in directions that have high impact but for you feel dispropor…
Question to anyone reading this: What is your answer to "if you weren't working on it, this problem would not get solved"?
Access to electricity is a massive problem and the number of people without access is actually projected to increase [1].
We need more people working on the problem and we especially need people from SSA working on it.
We are working to inspire young people and to provide them with the tools and knowledge they need to go and solve the problem of access to electricity. [2]
[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/561428/forecast-of-popul...
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#49You may be good at something but if you are not happy ... I think mao and hilter could. R said quite good in their deeds and mao is even now has no problem in killing 30m+ (more than 1 time - Great Leap Forward and cultural revolution).
Both are not happy men. May be they have sming pic but I have not aware much.
Be happy. Do no harm.
Assume that we are not in Olympic but we are always in the game of life. With that may I quote the motto, the most important thing in life is not about winning but about participation and you have tried your best.
Good luck.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#50These fokes devoted quite some time into thinking about your problem: https://80000hours.org/ From their homepage: "You have 80,000 hours in your career. Make the right career choices, and you can help solve the world’s most pressing problems, as well as have a more rewarding, interesting life. We’re here to give you the information you need to find that fulfilling, high-impact career. Our advice is all free, tailore…
My biggest issue with 80,000 hours is that it's a rational, but radically uninspiring advice in the end. It is a framework for those who buy into "don't follow your passion advice", and try to maximize their utility function instead.