Live data from Hacker News

Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

bieh.net

51–60 of 84 posts

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#51
post #12

Heh, cool - I was going to submit this myself after it bought a few more items, but I guess I was beaten to it. Any questions, or suggestions for smarter ways to select items to buy, feel free :)

How do you make sure you order tangible items? Lots of intangible items sell on eBay, like ebooks and other digital goods. Wouldn't this undermine the goal of receiving packages?

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#52
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about a $1 bill priced at $2 w/free shipping? From every angle, it would be an interesting experiment. From the consumer's standpoint, it challenges the notion of free shipping . From a seller's standpoint, it challenges the notion of easy money (would you really want to stuff a thousand envelopes if the item sold well?). From the middleman's standpoint, it might help to identify bots (or possibly even money laun…

You just gave me an idea, but I don't have time to implement it so I'll give it away. Maybe if someone makes money with it, they could sell me my bill. $1 bills priced at $2 w/free shipping.. the hook, the bills are listed by birthdates contained in the serial number. heh

You'd be undercutting these guys:

http://coins.shop.ebay.com/Federal-Reserve-Notes-/40029/i.ht...

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#53
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You just gave me an idea, but I don't have time to implement it so I'll give it away. Maybe if someone makes money with it, they could sell me my bill. $1 bills priced at $2 w/free shipping.. the hook, the bills are listed by birthdates contained in the serial number. heh

Go with $2 bills at $3 w/ free shipping. Some people would order it just to have $2 bill.

You can probably just ask for $2 bills at a bank. Last I checked, they still mint brand new ones to replace damaged ones removed from circulation.

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately you are not supposed to send money via the USPS.

You could send a check instead, payable to CASH. Although, your bank might get suspicious if hundreds of people start cashing small checks against your account.

That would be a pretty bad idea since checks include all the information someone needs to make hard to reverse withdrawals from your account. Knuth used to send checks but no longer does. See http://sunburn.stanford.edu/~knuth/news08.html.

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#55
post #12

Heh, cool - I was going to submit this myself after it bought a few more items, but I guess I was beaten to it. Any questions, or suggestions for smarter ways to select items to buy, feel free :)

Instead of running it once per day, you could run it hourly. Rank the items with the same algorithm, but take into account time left on the auction. An item expiring soon that scores really high could be purchased early so it doesn't get away. Items expiring later could be watched and dumped if the price goes too high, or determined to be worth the extra expense, if the amount is available in savings, so the more expensive good items don't get away either.

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#58
post #53
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Go with $2 bills at $3 w/ free shipping. Some people would order it just to have $2 bill.

You can probably just ask for $2 bills at a bank. Last I checked, they still mint brand new ones to replace damaged ones removed from circulation.

A bunch of engineers at idealab did this back during the bubble. The idea was the saturate Pasadena, CA with $2 bills, particularly as retailers, lacking anywhere to put $2 bills in registers, tended to quickly re-release them.

We tried buying them a thousand at a time from banks. One time a manager came out to talk to us about it and asked what we wanted them for. We explained and his response was, "So we're going to get them all back."

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#59
post #32

Just a small announce on HN, and the site is down. Why does most blog software fail at simple tasks like delivering static content? Apart from comments and quick corrections, blog articles _are_ nothing more than static content. And I'd be happy to not see any comments due to high server load, as long as I can read the article.

The Wordpress default install is horribly slow out of the box. The sad reality is that most blog software is not tuned to serve any reasonable number of pageviews by default.

It's one reason why letting someone manage all that for you makes sense. (Shameless plug) At Weebly we spent a lot of time making sure that our blogging engine is very optimized. We have free users -- they don't pay us any money, we don't place any ads on their site, and they even use their own domain -- hit the front page of Digg/Reddit/HN all the time, and we can easily handle it in stride.

Re: Implementing the auto-buying bot from xkcd #576

#60
post #15
post #2

I am tempted to write a bot to submit $1 items that his bot is likely to buy.

How about a $1 bill priced at $2 w/free shipping? From every angle, it would be an interesting experiment. From the consumer's standpoint, it challenges the notion of free shipping . From a seller's standpoint, it challenges the notion of easy money (would you really want to stuff a thousand envelopes if the item sold well?). From the middleman's standpoint, it might help to identify bots (or possibly even money laun…

To do this right, you have to be able to change the terms of the auction. Allow bidding for the $1 to start at a penny so it seems like a good deal. Then allow that the highest bidder gets the dollar, but doesn't have to pay... and the second-highest bidder must pay his bid amount, but receives nothing.

You should see dollar bills purchased for hundreds of dollars at least.

"The only way to win is not to play the game."

Post reply on HN