11–20 of 98 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same problem for me on Android with Firefox.
Wow, so it's not just me! I'll ask around Mozilla and see if anyone knows why Twitter does this.
For some reason, it is exclusive to the links opened from another apps and doesn't appear when accessing a link directly (via a refresh). That might narrow down your search a bit.
I'm using Buster[0] for this purpose, and it relies on the same method. Available on Firefox, Chrome and Opera in their respective add-on stores, and no additional steps are needed (like in this project). From my experience, it works perfectly in a default session and not at all in the private browsing mode. I've never bothered to figure out why is that (possibly some other add-on interfering). [0] https://github.com…
I'm guessing Google will start using some sort of steganography to prevent this from happening.
Steganography prevents for people to use their exact service while making it more difficult in general prevents people from using any existing service.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same problem for me on Android with Firefox.
Wow, so it's not just me! I'll ask around Mozilla and see if anyone knows why Twitter does this.
Also t.co links from within the Twitter app don't load at all from me until I hit "open in Firefox" on the drop-down.
I've seen this a week ago on reddit. The researched told google about this vulnerability and Google doesnt care about it, they are totally OK with it. You can see here that captcha doesn't block robots, but blocks people and makes browsing inconvenient. reCaptcha is a way google mines data from us for free.
> Google doesnt care about it, they are totally OK with it
Google hasn't said they don't care about it, where did you see any of that ?
They merely allowed the code to be released despite it still working against the current. Previous experience (namely the original uncaptcha) prove that they intend to find a way to fix it.
> You can see here that captcha doesn't block robots, but blocks people and makes browsing inconvenient.
Total BS, remember it's not Google that uses it, it's website owners (us), if what you claim was indeed true we wouldn't be using it, we would use something else that did what we wanted.
> reCaptcha is a way google mines data from us for free.
Of course, through the visual selection it displays when "unsure", although I do not know the detail it seems pretty obvious that once it's sure you're human it sometimes ask you to detect things in picture anyway so as to provide training data (for maps, waymo, image search, whatever ...)
I've seen this a week ago on reddit. The researched told google about this vulnerability and Google doesnt care about it, they are totally OK with it. You can see here that captcha doesn't block robots, but blocks people and makes browsing inconvenient. reCaptcha is a way google mines data from us for free.
Oh please, what a total joke of a comment. > Google doesnt care about it, they are totally OK with it Google hasn't said they don't care about it, where did you see any of that ? They merely allowed the code to be released despite it still working against the current. Previous experience (namely the original uncaptcha) prove that they intend to find a way to fix it. > You can see here that captcha doesn't block robot…
> Google hasn't said they don't care about it, where did you see any of that ?
Check this out:
> The Recaptcha team is aware of this attack vector, and have confirmed they are okay with us releasing this code, despite its current success rate.
Source: https://github.com/ecthros/uncaptcha2/blob/master/README.md
I've seen this a week ago on reddit. The researched told google about this vulnerability and Google doesnt care about it, they are totally OK with it. You can see here that captcha doesn't block robots, but blocks people and makes browsing inconvenient. reCaptcha is a way google mines data from us for free.
Oh please, what a total joke of a comment. > Google doesnt care about it, they are totally OK with it Google hasn't said they don't care about it, where did you see any of that ? They merely allowed the code to be released despite it still working against the current. Previous experience (namely the original uncaptcha) prove that they intend to find a way to fix it. > You can see here that captcha doesn't block robot…
Not saying this is the case here, but cargo culting does exist in tech, so this is quite a weak argument in my opinion.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Wow, so it's not just me! I'll ask around Mozilla and see if anyone knows why Twitter does this.
A refresh usually helps, and this "feature" isn't exclusive to Firefox. For some reason, it is exclusive to the links opened from another apps and doesn't appear when accessing a link directly (via a refresh). That might narrow down your search a bit.
I think they cap guest views/minute.