Venus – RISC-V Simulator
thaumicmekanism.github.io
Venus – RISC-V Simulator
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#2There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#3I am older and seen a lot of tech come and go. RISC-V feels to me like something that will be huge. There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
Perhaps a good comparison point is LLVM. It too originated as an academic project. Again looking at Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LLVM) it started development in 2000, first release 2003, Lattner hired by Apple to develop it 2005, Clang released by Apple 2007 (so ~7 years from initial LLVM creation to serious production use potentially less depends when Apple were using it internally).
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#4I am older and seen a lot of tech come and go. RISC-V feels to me like something that will be huge. There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
It's worth noting the age of RISC-V, according to Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V ) it originated as a 'short, three-month project over the summer' in 2010. So ~8 and a bit years old. It's taken a while to really take-off but now it does really seem to be picking up momentum. Though no serious use in production hardware that I'm aware of. Perhaps a good comparison point is LLVM. It too originated as…
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#5I am older and seen a lot of tech come and go. RISC-V feels to me like something that will be huge. There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
It's worth noting the age of RISC-V, according to Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V ) it originated as a 'short, three-month project over the summer' in 2010. So ~8 and a bit years old. It's taken a while to really take-off but now it does really seem to be picking up momentum. Though no serious use in production hardware that I'm aware of. Perhaps a good comparison point is LLVM. It too originated as…
It's just a question of opportunity for change.
RISC-V while take on when there's a reason to not use ARM and if it's better than the competition (eg: MIPS).
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's worth noting the age of RISC-V, according to Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V ) it originated as a 'short, three-month project over the summer' in 2010. So ~8 and a bit years old. It's taken a while to really take-off but now it does really seem to be picking up momentum. Though no serious use in production hardware that I'm aware of. Perhaps a good comparison point is LLVM. It too originated as…
You can't really compare hardware with software. It's just a question of opportunity for change. RISC-V while take on when there's a reason to not use ARM and if it's better than the competition (eg: MIPS).
No licensing fees.
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#7Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#8I am older and seen a lot of tech come and go. RISC-V feels to me like something that will be huge. There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#9I am older and seen a lot of tech come and go. RISC-V feels to me like something that will be huge. There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
If they see the threat and dramatically reduce prices, ARM will stay dominant while RISCV remains a 'maybe one day' thing.
If they miss the threat, the industry will switch over to RISCV, and ARM will go bankrupt.
The whole RISCV project exists as a bargaining chip against ARM.
Re: Venus – RISC-V Simulator
#10I am older and seen a lot of tech come and go. RISC-V feels to me like something that will be huge. There is so much momentum already. Not many things catch on that quick. But when they do they end up huge.
It's worth noting the age of RISC-V, according to Wikipedia ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RISC-V ) it originated as a 'short, three-month project over the summer' in 2010. So ~8 and a bit years old. It's taken a while to really take-off but now it does really seem to be picking up momentum. Though no serious use in production hardware that I'm aware of. Perhaps a good comparison point is LLVM. It too originated as…
https://community.cadence.com/cfs-file/__key/communityserver...
So I agree, it takes 7 years. RISC-V is already in production in many places by now.