Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is most definitely censorship. It is not state censorship, and it is not prohibited by the law, but it's definitely an activity targeted to suppress expression of ideas Patreon censors do not like, and it is clearly fitting every reasonable definition of censorship. The fact that it's not state censorship and thus not aided by state repressive apparatus makes it less abhorrent, but still harmful enough. Especially…
Again: these are private businesses, free to do business (or not) with whomever they choose, for completely arbitrary reasons. If you want to fight that, you have to fight capitalism.
> If you want to fight that, you have to fight capitalism.
Bullshit. People regularly fight legal actions by private corporations, and regularly win. Society has hundreds of ways for corporations to stop doing something that is legal but is seen by society as harmful. Capitalism is still alive and well.