Live data from Hacker News

One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

latimes.com

141–150 of 170 posts

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#141
post #138

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once there is a viable life form inside of you, it's no longer just about you controlling your life when you decide to kill it.

Should a bacterial infection have the same rights? It's a perfectly viable life form.

[deleted]

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#142
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tell me about it. I openly smoke marijuana in public places. Why? It's a LOT LESS HARMFUL THAN SECOND HAND TOBACCO. I see uninformed parents scowling at me for blowing marijuana smoke away from them while they are smoking cigarettes infront of their kids. Anyways, if you see a guy smoking weed around Robson square, that's me.

What if I don't want any kind of smoke in public places? I know I'm well into the minority on this one, but I think it's antisocial behavior to smoke anything where the general public will catch so much as a whiff of it and the people who knowingly do it are jerks, but for some reason this is very normalized behavior. I'm not anti-drug though; smoke whatever you want cloistered away from the public.

>What if I don't want any kind of smoke in public places?

Then you can stay at home.

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#143

It all comes down to local control of licensing. To even operate a 100% mobile business, you have to be licensed out of a specific city. This involves all the associated cronyism, NIMBYism, and the like which goes along with local politics, and grinds the whole system to a halt. We need to adopt a statewide system like Oregon or there will be no room for smaller distributors left and we will be stuck with monopolized…

> It all comes down to local control of licensing. To even operate a 100% mobile business, you have to be licensed out of a specific city Why would it take the ability to have a "100% mobile business" to make it a booming market?

I think the grandparent comment just switched some words around. I think it's meant to be read as "To operate even a 100% mobile business...". I.e., these restrictions apply even if your business is 100% mobile.

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#144

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which treaty is that?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_Convention_on_Narcotic_... This was the first result for both “drugs treaty” and “Narcotics treaty”.

Is canada not a signatory on that treaty then?

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#146
post #17

It all comes down to local control of licensing. To even operate a 100% mobile business, you have to be licensed out of a specific city. This involves all the associated cronyism, NIMBYism, and the like which goes along with local politics, and grinds the whole system to a halt. We need to adopt a statewide system like Oregon or there will be no room for smaller distributors left and we will be stuck with monopolized…

I'm personally fine with local control, and despite the negative tone of this article, it all sounds pretty normal to me. I live in SF, where there are a variety of shops. The ones I walk by all seem clean, orderly, and well run. Certainly more so than some liquor stores I can think of. So I'm happy to have them as neighbors. That said, I understand why other cities would have been more reluctant to license. Not ever…

This is an algorithmic issue up to a point. Local optimization is often 'easier' than global optimization but does not necessarily find a global optimum.

On the other hand, some systems do just fine navigating a complex problem space by just solving large number of local optimization problems. See for example slime molds, which are colonies without centralized nervous system, yet manage to move and forage for sustenance successfully as long as the environment is solvable.

It's more efficient if everyone get's their own breakfast but the central bank should take care of the interest rate affecting the money that's used to buy the breakfast. Etc

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"There is nothing that stops the federal US government from throwing someone in jail for growing / transporting / using / processing payment for marijuana." I always wondered about that. Has there been any chatter about someone trying to get a federal court to nullify the law? I have no idea how that can work.

> Has there been any chatter about someone trying to get a federal court to nullify the law? I have no idea how that can work. The US has signed up to a treaty that requires us to treat marijuana as an illegal controlled substance. That requires an explicit act of Congress to abrogate, and no court is going to find otherwise.

We all know how much the US cares about upholding international treaties lol.

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#148
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tell me about it. I openly smoke marijuana in public places. Why? It's a LOT LESS HARMFUL THAN SECOND HAND TOBACCO. I see uninformed parents scowling at me for blowing marijuana smoke away from them while they are smoking cigarettes infront of their kids. Anyways, if you see a guy smoking weed around Robson square, that's me.

What if I don't want any kind of smoke in public places? I know I'm well into the minority on this one, but I think it's antisocial behavior to smoke anything where the general public will catch so much as a whiff of it and the people who knowingly do it are jerks, but for some reason this is very normalized behavior. I'm not anti-drug though; smoke whatever you want cloistered away from the public.

I personally hate the stench of weed. Prohibition is good because people think twice before making an entire street reek just because they want to get high.

Re: One year into legal pot sales California doesn’t have expected bustling industry

#149
post #117

Earlier quoted context omitted.

tell me about it. I openly smoke marijuana in public places. Why? It's a LOT LESS HARMFUL THAN SECOND HAND TOBACCO. I see uninformed parents scowling at me for blowing marijuana smoke away from them while they are smoking cigarettes infront of their kids. Anyways, if you see a guy smoking weed around Robson square, that's me.

What if I don't want any kind of smoke in public places? I know I'm well into the minority on this one, but I think it's antisocial behavior to smoke anything where the general public will catch so much as a whiff of it and the people who knowingly do it are jerks, but for some reason this is very normalized behavior. I'm not anti-drug though; smoke whatever you want cloistered away from the public.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN