Earlier quoted context omitted.
I turned off the feature that shows calls on my MacBook because of this. It's nice that the UI shows "Scam Likely" as the caller, but maybe give me an option to filter out those calls entirely? Let them go to voicemail or something... who is answering the phone when the caller is unknown and identified by the UI as "Scam Likely"?
Yes! I would even go so far as to say if the caller isn't in my phonebook let them go to voicemail. Or at least give me the option in settings. If I don't know who's calling they're getting my voicemail 100% of the time.
Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
61–70 of 303 posts
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#62I actually would like a regulatory solution for this. Mandate a way for me to say whether incoming calls were spam. Require my phone company to pay me money every time I get spammed. Allow my phone company to, at their option, proactively block calls from specific upstreams and/or pass the charge to the specific upstreams. Now from those incentives, the fines will naturally follow the upstreams to the source of the s…
The UK has a solution. It does actually work, mostly:
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
I turned off the feature that shows calls on my MacBook because of this. It's nice that the UI shows "Scam Likely" as the caller, but maybe give me an option to filter out those calls entirely? Let them go to voicemail or something... who is answering the phone when the caller is unknown and identified by the UI as "Scam Likely"?
That's a T-Mobile feature, not an Apple feature, and you can change your settings to block the calls instead of just ID'ing them. https://www.t-mobile.com/resources/call-protection
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#64https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/Telekommunik...
FTA: After the E wie Einfach GmbH had found agencies for the advertising measures, obviously no more control took place. Therefore the E.ON daughter is occupied now with a fine of 140.000 euro. Because as a client of the call actions it must guarantee the adherence to the legal principles. This includes above all that in each individual case an explicit consent of the consumers is present. The client is responsible for this, even if the telephone calls are carried out by subcontractors. However, the decision of the Federal Network Agency is not yet legally binding: the electricity supplier can appeal the fine in court.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator
https://www.e-recht24.de/news/telekommunikation/10928-unerla...
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#65https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-354933A1.pdf (Background and open letters to carriers: https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-pai-demands-industry-a...)
How it works, short version: https://transnexus.com/blog/2017/stop-spoofed-robocalls-with...
How it works, long version: http://www.atis.org/01_resources/whitepapers/#shaken-studies (find in page for “SHAKEN” and “Caller ID”)
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#66"At the telelphony-infrastructure level, it’s a supremely difficult problem that lacks a short-term fix because the underlying protocol is hopelessly insecure." This is only partly true. Technologically the solution is difficult, but it's easy from the social side as carriers can blacklist the smaller carriers that allow this fraud to take place. The real problem is that everyone except the consumer benefits from thi…
I agree there’s a lot the carriers could be accomplishing in flagging “inauthentic” behavior of network participants, the root cause of SS7’s lack of authentication and encryption will remain and the problem will fester. Yes, carriers are definitely on the hook for making things better too. That said, the decisions in Apple's client side software are atrocious for the considerations of 2019. Aside: No idea why my pos…
The sheer number of scammers and nation state actors that have taken advantage of this is mind-blowing, but we still use SMS as a 2FA.
If we have telephony providers responsible for these breaches the problem will disappear in 6 months.
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#67The eventual fix will be adopting ATIS SHAKEN and STIR protocols, which is, very roughly, signed caller ID. The FCC is now demanding it of carriers: https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-354933A1.pdf (Background and open letters to carriers: https://www.fcc.gov/document/chairman-pai-demands-industry-a... ) How it works, short version: https://transnexus.com/blog/2017/stop-spoofed-robocalls-with... How it works,…
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#68Since the phone companies are too busy trying to build content empires rather than working to improve their core competencies, it's time for Apple to step up the call-blocking experience at the OS level. The addition of a call-blocking API was a very good first step, but the time is fast arriving when robust blocking patterns will be table stakes similar to what basic email spam filtering is today.
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#69I actually would like a regulatory solution for this. Mandate a way for me to say whether incoming calls were spam. Require my phone company to pay me money every time I get spammed. Allow my phone company to, at their option, proactively block calls from specific upstreams and/or pass the charge to the specific upstreams. Now from those incentives, the fines will naturally follow the upstreams to the source of the s…
”I actually would like a regulatory solution for this.” The UK has a solution. It does actually work, mostly: https://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/index.html
Re: Apple needs to change iPhone’s call UI because robocalls are killing us
#70I actually would like a regulatory solution for this. Mandate a way for me to say whether incoming calls were spam. Require my phone company to pay me money every time I get spammed. Allow my phone company to, at their option, proactively block calls from specific upstreams and/or pass the charge to the specific upstreams. Now from those incentives, the fines will naturally follow the upstreams to the source of the s…
”I actually would like a regulatory solution for this.” The UK has a solution. It does actually work, mostly: https://www.tpsonline.org.uk/tps/index.html
However spoofers who know that they won't be tracked back to the source don't care about do not call lists.