11–20 of 43 posts
Anybody remember good old https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impossible_Is_Nothing_(video_r... from the dark ages of the Internet?
Well, on a positive note, since they pay for those products themselves, they can write off the cost from their taxes. #thot_patrol https://www.reddit.com/r/thot_patrol/
Lots of people out there who ascribe their grievances to a group of "others", be that immigrants, ethnicities, genders etc. I can see those channels turning into a confirmation bias echo chamber pretty quick.
Will this ultimately lower the revenue from sponsored content if so many people are tripping over themselves to pay companies to post their content?
Well, on a positive note, since they pay for those products themselves, they can write off the cost from their taxes. #thot_patrol https://www.reddit.com/r/thot_patrol/
I like justice porn as much as anybody else, but I wonder if some of these outlets become more about venting one's misogyny, more than about pointing out wrongdoing? Lots of people out there who ascribe their grievances to a group of "others", be that immigrants, ethnicities, genders etc. I can see those channels turning into a confirmation bias echo chamber pretty quick.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like justice porn as much as anybody else, but I wonder if some of these outlets become more about venting one's misogyny, more than about pointing out wrongdoing? Lots of people out there who ascribe their grievances to a group of "others", be that immigrants, ethnicities, genders etc. I can see those channels turning into a confirmation bias echo chamber pretty quick.
IMO, it is just misogyny. They don't target the equivalent esports and gaming personalities (mostly male) who do the same thing, and it's couched in the language of "thots" instead of, you know, something thats not a derogatory term for women. Plus, I find it really hard to believe that most of these people actually care about fair taxation -- are they also informing the IRS about the kid on their block making money…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Smells like an FCC regulation waiting to happen I don't see a problem. Users want influencers backed by brands. Brands want influencers with lots of users. Unless the influencer falsely represents their sponsorship history to a brand, this "hack" doesn't hurt anyone. The worst-off party are users. They follow someone they think is shilling products but is actually shilling themselves. Given this is Instagram, I don…
Most of the time this doesn't hurt anyone, but let's say for the sake of argument that one of these influencers isn't a mildly attractive middle-class teenage girl with thoughts that don't extend beyond family friendly fun and self-enrichment. Let's say instead you have a 25 year old man who started out with inspirational instagram posts have slowly started to cross the line into far-right slogans and maga hats. Now…
Sometimes I'm suprised at society. Then I'm annoyed at my surprise. Then I tell myself not everybody is like this.