Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

news.ycombinator.com

101–110 of 205 posts

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#101
post #81

Recent but great talk posted here, What Bodies Think About: Bioelectric Computation Outside the Nervous System [1] by Prof. Michael Levin. He talks about how long term low energy electrical networks between all cells in living organisms shape how the organism grows. I think what he talks about will be the future of medicine as it allows for an amazing degree of high level control over how animals grow. 1. https://www…

Oh boy, this is cool!

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#104
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I meant a never ending stream of sophisticated ideas and precise data that leads nowhere. I used to watch every interview of the guy[1] and .. I always left the video empty minded. [1] he seemed to have human values and of course knowledge about the topic

Ok, we're going down a rabbit hole here, but just to clarify, you meant "pub talk" as in the kind of conversation people have at a pub after a few beers? Or "public talk" as in a public speech, as nikofeyn suggested?

pub/bar sorry

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#105
Inside The Fake Science Factory from DefCon 26. First you'll laugh. And then you'll weep for humanity!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ras_VYgA77Q

Also really dug Jeremy Rifkin's The Third Industrial Revolution: A Radical New Sharing Economy. Outlines the rollout of a possible new engineering platform consisting of free energy, satellite internet, and AI.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QX3M8Ka9vUA

Keep the links coming, please. Terrific counter-programming for holiday down time ;)

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#106
Some of my favorite talks from Strange Loop:

* Contracts For Getting More Programs Less Wrong: https://www.thestrangeloop.com/2018/contracts-for-getting-mo...

* "It's Just Matrix Multiplication": Notation for Weaving: https://www.thestrangeloop.com/2018/its-just-matrix-multipli...

* Hackett: a metaprogrammable Haskell: https://www.thestrangeloop.com/2018/hackett-a-metaprogrammab...

* Git from the Ground Up: https://www.thestrangeloop.com/2018/git-from-the-ground-up.h...

From PyCon:

* Beyond Unit Tests: Taking Your Testing to the Next Level: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MYucYon2-lk

* Dataclasses: The code generator to end all code generator: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-TwcmT6Rcw

* Automating Code Quality: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1lDk_WKXvY

There are probably more I might add later as I remember them.

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#107
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what good does it do pointing that out, if it's even true? it's clear they meant articulate and public.

“Pub talk” is a thing, and “can’t discern from overengineered pub talk” makes sense. “Can’t discern from overengineered public talk” is plausible, but it would be very unusual to phrase it that way. It’s not really clear that he meant "public."

i can see "overengineered pub talk" as a specific critique instead of them meaning public. i am probably wrong there. but the point still stands as it's rude and not important to make a mention of their english, especially when it seems what they meant is one of two things, both of which make sense.

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#108
post #97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Ok, we're going down a rabbit hole here, but just to clarify, you meant "pub talk" as in the kind of conversation people have at a pub after a few beers? Or "public talk" as in a public speech, as nikofeyn suggested?

pub/bar sorry

No problem! You said exactly what you meant. And it got me interested so I'm watching the video for myself now.

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#109
post #79
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would not surprise me. It is my understanding that not a lot of people that actually understand how the EU works are pro EU at this point...

Source please? What are you basing this on?

I guess just people that I'm around and some third party news sources that have a pretty big following. Sorry to disappoint :)

Re: Ask HN: Best talks of 2018?

#110
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>that a function of Maybe a should be a function of a without an API change is neither intuitive to me nor really justified by Hickey He spent many minutes motivating it. If you support some functionality to a client (as a library, or a service, or more abstractly), and then later want to relax the constraints that you require from those clients, this should be an acceptable change that they shouldn't have to worry a…

His argument for spurious API breakage is strictly logically correct, but seems practically dubious to me. When have you ever had to unnecessarily break API compatibility because something you thought was an Option[T] result turned out to be really a T, always? Maybe I'm wrong and someone will post some convincing examples, but I currently don't see this as a problem that needs solving. Union Types don't compose stra…

I think you're kind of both agreeing. It would be nice if Maybe did work like he suggested, but in practice it's not that big a deal.
Post reply on HN