Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think slimy get rich quick was referring to the snake oil peddled by the interviewees. If Andrew can be accused of anything, it is for writing a sloppy puff-piece and not submitting these fantasy claims to any scrutiny.
If I recall correctly, in previous interviews Andrew has talked about running background checks and verifications on reported incomes. Overall I think he's a great interviewer.
When I interview someone who wasn't referred by someone I know or when I'm unsure of the numbers before an interview, I often ask them to log into their affiliate or paypal or bank account to show me activity using Skype's desktop share. Or I ask for their accountant to confirm their numbers. Or I ask to see their tax returns. I always keep what I see private.
In this case, I didn't need to do that because: a) $80k per month for iPhone makers isn't shocking -- as other have said in the comments -- b) anyone who checks out the app store on a regular basis will recognize the apps these guys made because they're often the most popular in their categories. You can check on this right now, and c) the big part of this story was that they outsourced everything and elance confirmed that.
Finally, I can't be 100% accurate with every interview I do -- not even close. I count on readers to point out when I get my data wrong and when I let my interviewee get away with lying.
I don't think that's the case here. But when it comes up, say something.
I respect readers' opinions and feedback. Anyone is welcome to call me "slimy," but there's no need to do that to get my attention.