Like any anonymous forums, Blind is toxic. Hope it dies a quick death
At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
41–50 of 141 posts
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#42I'd never checked out Blind before. I just went there and checked out a few of the front page posts & comments. It has some of the most toxic and destructive "advice" I've seen for people asking for help or insight. I'm a bit astounded. Is this typical?
It's pathetic, you see some of the most depraved, narcissistic members of the tech society there. The quality of the discourse you can guess is shockingly bad, and most people are from the Bay area. Is this an accurate representation of people in the Bay? Or is it just a platform for toxic folk to hang out?
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#43I'd never checked out Blind before. I just went there and checked out a few of the front page posts & comments. It has some of the most toxic and destructive "advice" I've seen for people asking for help or insight. I'm a bit astounded. Is this typical?
It's pathetic, you see some of the most depraved, narcissistic members of the tech society there. The quality of the discourse you can guess is shockingly bad, and most people are from the Bay area. Is this an accurate representation of people in the Bay? Or is it just a platform for toxic folk to hang out?
Blind could have been an opportunity for them to get direct and honest insight into how the sausage is made but instead is trolling and leetcode-your-way-to-fang obsessing.
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#44I'd never checked out Blind before. I just went there and checked out a few of the front page posts & comments. It has some of the most toxic and destructive "advice" I've seen for people asking for help or insight. I'm a bit astounded. Is this typical?
Examples?
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#45Like any anonymous forums, Blind is toxic. Hope it dies a quick death
I don’t think anonymity guarantees toxicity, but anonymity without any sort of rule enforcement sure seems to guarantee toxicity.
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#46They made a big mistake, but generally I love reading Blind. There are a lot of interesting things on it about which I couldn't talk even to my own colleagues.
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#47>At its core, the app and anonymous social network allows users to sign up using their corporate email address, which is said to be linked only to Blind’s member ID. People just trusted it? I get that to seem legitimate the users have to be confirmed in some way, but as a user... now way am I exposing myself that way.
Major things wrong: unencrypted email addresses + private messages, leaving the database without a password, database wasn't fixed until a week after knowing of the error.
I find it concerning that this kind of news seems normal now.
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#48Wait, Blind doesn't use end-to-end encryption?
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's pathetic, you see some of the most depraved, narcissistic members of the tech society there. The quality of the discourse you can guess is shockingly bad, and most people are from the Bay area. Is this an accurate representation of people in the Bay? Or is it just a platform for toxic folk to hang out?
Blind is to Silicon Valley what 4chan is to the internet
Re: At Blind, a security lapse revealed private complaints from tech employees
#50Like any anonymous forums, Blind is toxic. Hope it dies a quick death