They ll still keep publishing in elsevier journals though
Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
11–20 of 38 posts
Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#12Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#13Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#14Every nail in Elsevier coffin is a great news, paywaled scientific publications is an archaic, dystopian and shameful legacy that should never exist in a first place.
I agree with the sentiment but I do think the service journals provide was once worthwhile, before the web, as disseminaters of academic knowledge. Universities paid a subscription fee for physical copies of journals, allowing their employees to keep up to date with what was happening in the world of science. Once the web took off the proposition was no longer good value, as scientists could bypass publishers. It jus…
"The Lancet finds itself connected to... global arms trade: a trade that inflicts physical and social harm in the poorest and least stable regions. Since 2003, The Lancet's owner and publisher, Reed Elsevier, has organised some of the world's largest arms" https://t.co/rIbch7S6dy
Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#15Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#16Glad to see interest in Elsevier is declining. https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=all&q=elsevier...
Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#17Every nail in Elsevier coffin is a great news, paywaled scientific publications is an archaic, dystopian and shameful legacy that should never exist in a first place.
Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#18What is it? Sci-Hub?
Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#19The Max Planck Digital Library has already set in place mechanisms to address the content needs of its researchers when Elsevier shuts off access at the beginning of January. What is it? Sci-Hub?
Re: Max Planck Society Discontinues Agreement with Elsevier
#20Every nail in Elsevier coffin is a great news, paywaled scientific publications is an archaic, dystopian and shameful legacy that should never exist in a first place.
I am a bit on the fence about the violent nature but if publishers play hard ball, I'm not sure who to blame. In the meantime, if access through libraries is revoked and if that could go on for a whi... oh right, sci-hub, but that works because of running subscriptions. What's the end-game, it goes on slowly and gradually, untill the currently invaluable material became obsolete while a substantial pre-print based re…