A couple of our employees from Syria also got blocked today. They were using Slack from Syria though. EDIT: I don't understand why they ban/block the account rather than "simply" block access from IPs from the country. This seems really strange and overreaching.
How do you have employees in Syria? It’s a violation of federal sanctions. Edit: In the US, UK, and EU.
Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
101–110 of 638 posts
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#102If you work for an American company, get a bug report from a user you know to be in Iran against an open source project you work on during company time and fix it as a result, can the company be considered to be engaging in commerce with Iran?
Direct exchange of value has to take place. In this case no, because fixing that bug in your project doesn't benefit him specifically.
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#103My wife’s Slack account was closed yesterday. She created the account while traveling in Cuba (legally) years ago and hasn’t been back to Cuba or any other sanctioned country since. She is a cofounder of an org that uses Slack heavily and has now lost access to all her messages and files from the past couple years of work. There appears to be no appeal process here.
The appeal process is filing a lawsuit against Slack, provided the person wronged didn’t already agree to give up that right when accepting Slack’s TOS.
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#104As an outsider, I am really surprised by how deep-rooted America's hostility is towards Iran. Shi'ite Iran certainly has human rights issues, but as far as terrorism is concerned the majority of them are orchestrated by Sunni groups. 9/11 hijackers, Al Queda, Islamic State, Paris attackers - are all Sunni.
Kind of ironic when you consider the leaders of a country using patriotism for their personal gain. It’s so weird seeing all the flag toting, national anthem singing population in the US tow the line when they can’t even be bothered to learn their country’s history or participate in the civic process and hold its leaders accountable.
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#105Why not give the user even a few days notice so they can communicate with support to try and clear things up? Taking the OP's story at face value, Slack should easily be able to verify with him that he lives in Canada. Instead, they simply block it and bye. I find this extremely hostile.
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#106I think Slack is sending a clear and strong message: use a VPN!
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#107Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This is another good reason to choose Zulipchat and other self-hostable platforms instead of proprietary SaaS solutions until someone targets your host and gets it shut down.
Then at least you can move it elsewhere.
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#108Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#109As an outsider, I am really surprised by how deep-rooted America's hostility is towards Iran. Shi'ite Iran certainly has human rights issues, but as far as terrorism is concerned the majority of them are orchestrated by Sunni groups. 9/11 hijackers, Al Queda, Islamic State, Paris attackers - are all Sunni.
But I think the defiance is why the US elite hates Iran. They successfully kicked out a US-backed leader, humiliated Carter's rescue plan, fought off a US-backed Iraqi invasion, defied the US over nuclear proliferation. Refusing to follow US orders enrages the US.
Ironically there has been extensive on-the-ground cooperation between the US and Iran while fighting ISIS in eastern Syria.
Re: Slack closes account of an Iranian user living in Canada
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
>This is another good reason to choose Zulipchat and other self-hostable platforms instead of proprietary SaaS solutions until someone targets your host and gets it shut down.
I don't understand what's wrong with this comment, but OP is right. We have seen cases where domain registries or hosting providers suspend accounts for violating their ToS, which is totally legal.
But in all honesty, there are hundreds of registrars and thousands of hosting providers around the world. Not all of them fall under US jurisdiction. But if you’re really really paranoid of getting shut down, there’s also .onion sites or distributed systems like IPFS.
You can not prevent people from communicating on the internet any more than you can prevent people from writing letters.