This is so true. I went to Shanghai about 3 summers ago right when Denver was finishing up the "A Line" train from Downtown to the Airport. This project cost over a billion dollars and the damn thing can't run smoothly or stay operational. Tons of issues. Meanwhile we took the Maglev train from the Pudong Airport to the Shanghai City Center. The Maglev cost $1.2 billion dollars [1]. The train can travel up to 270 MPH…
Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
91–100 of 207 posts
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#92This is so true. I went to Shanghai about 3 summers ago right when Denver was finishing up the "A Line" train from Downtown to the Airport. This project cost over a billion dollars and the damn thing can't run smoothly or stay operational. Tons of issues. Meanwhile we took the Maglev train from the Pudong Airport to the Shanghai City Center. The Maglev cost $1.2 billion dollars [1]. The train can travel up to 270 MPH…
The technology to build fast trains has existed for more than 60 years.
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#93This is so true. I went to Shanghai about 3 summers ago right when Denver was finishing up the "A Line" train from Downtown to the Airport. This project cost over a billion dollars and the damn thing can't run smoothly or stay operational. Tons of issues. Meanwhile we took the Maglev train from the Pudong Airport to the Shanghai City Center. The Maglev cost $1.2 billion dollars [1]. The train can travel up to 270 MPH…
We could have that too if our government had unchecked eminent domain power. Is that what we want? Seems to be one or the other.
edit: I guess that is redundant under unchecked eminent domain power.
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#94Another weird thing to me, as a foreigner in the US, is the fascination people have for the "troops".
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#95It depicts a boundary line between the city and urban village. And government had the power to relocate 150k in a snap to get the development going [1]
How many countries can actually do that? Sure, couple of hundreds of people can be moved but 100k people, I am sure that cause a riot of sorts and project shut down very quickly.
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#96Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#97Another weird thing to me, as a foreigner in the US, is the fascination people have for the "troops".
If we all just say "Thank you!!" over and over again, we are absolved.
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#98>He said the U.S. has wasted over $14 trillion in fighting wars over the past 30 years rather than investing in infrastructure at home. The US spent $14 trillion upholding a world order of free trade and international maritime law which directly benefited China and was responsible for its own export based growth over the last 30 years. We're seeing that global order realign now, with things like Brexit and Trump, but…
I am a huge supporter of the U.S. Navy's freedom of navigation duties. It's expensive, and it's worth it. But carpet bombing Baghdad does nothing for our trade routes.
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#99This is so true. I went to Shanghai about 3 summers ago right when Denver was finishing up the "A Line" train from Downtown to the Airport. This project cost over a billion dollars and the damn thing can't run smoothly or stay operational. Tons of issues. Meanwhile we took the Maglev train from the Pudong Airport to the Shanghai City Center. The Maglev cost $1.2 billion dollars [1]. The train can travel up to 270 MPH…
Re: Jack Ma: US wasted trillions on warfare instead of investing in infrastructure
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed, completely on point regardless of source. History has proven trickle-down economics to be ineffective, and Michael Douglas' "greed is good" to be objectively false.
Attributing "greed is good" to Michael Douglas is like attributing "Soon the world will feel the loving grip of the Pax Bisonica!" to Raúl Juliá.