Live data from Hacker News

Shanghai City in panoramic view in 195 gigapixels

sh-meet.bigpixel.cn

51–60 of 94 posts

Re: Shanghai City in panoramic view in 195 gigapixels

#51

How are pictures like these taken? What kind of equipment would you need?

They are shot with a dSLR and a very long lens. This one was likely shot with a 300mm lens. The camera is mounted on a programmable robot, and a mosaic of photos is created. They are then stitched together with software such as PTGui or kolor Autopano Giga. I've shot a number of images like this, in fact some of them over 4x bigger than this one. My largest one, of Prague, was released 2 weeks ago: http://360gigapixe…

Thank you for the amazing works.

There is a type in the copyright footer on your website, it states (c) 1066 - 2019

Re: Shanghai City in panoramic view in 195 gigapixels

#52

It's interesting seeing how they dealt with moving objects like the boats. If you scan anti-clockwise until the river is hidden behind the buildings you should see two tour boats with "China Bohai Bank" on the side. One appears to be pulling in and one pull out. If you look at the passengers - it's actually the same boat. If you follow the river clockwise, you'll see two barges carrying dark material. Again, these ar…

People too, unless this lady has an identical twin with the same umbrella https://imgur.com/NQ5keHY I haven't seen any ugly merges between the frames yet, but they can't have been done manually

https://imgur.com/a/hgBdkJJ

This one looks a bit dodgy

Re: Shanghai City in panoramic view in 195 gigapixels

#53
post #50

It's interesting seeing how they dealt with moving objects like the boats. If you scan anti-clockwise until the river is hidden behind the buildings you should see two tour boats with "China Bohai Bank" on the side. One appears to be pulling in and one pull out. If you look at the passengers - it's actually the same boat. If you follow the river clockwise, you'll see two barges carrying dark material. Again, these ar…

Why would that be manual and not an artifact of movement between snapshots? If it were manual effort,why wouldn't they erase a duplicate?

Look at the barges I mentioned (https://imgur.com/a/ZNaLCuO). Clearly this specific case isn't an automatic stitching of photos. We must agree that there is only one barge and, though not copied, one instance of the boat has been moved out of line from the other. It would look ugly otherwise.

> Why wouldn't they erase a duplicate?

This I don't have a good reason for, which is why i thought this was curious

Post reply on HN