Live data from Hacker News

Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

bbc.com

271–280 of 940 posts

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I cannot believe I know this...but the location on the map is actually the McCallister's house from Home Alone, in Illinois, Mark lives in California. I looked it up a few months ago...and I recognized the google map as soon as it popped up on the video. https://goo.gl/maps/1sytkJCxFqn

He mentions that he used that address on the package too.

This was very well thought out.

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#272
post #173

This needs careful consideration if you ever decide to do it. Depending on the local criminal culture they could exact revenge. Then also know where you live and can do a lot worse things than taking a package. Police might later be involved but it might not be worth it. You are dealing with people who have no qualms stealing so it's not too crazy to expect other rash and illegal acts from them. I can also see some i…

> You are dealing with people who have no qualms stealing, it's not too crazy to expect other rash and illegal acts from them. In more then one instance the thief opened the package at their house. So its fair to say he knows where they live too. Also, very clear HD video of their faces and vehicles. And there is no way all the glitter is going to get cleaned up - so more evidence of who they are. And home security c…

Sadly, a video of a random figure with face obscured throwing a rock through your car window isn't going to get the police involved. Even with a GPS location of someone you pranked with a package, if there's no evidence directly tying the two incidents, the police aren't going to waste resources doing CSI on it. They'll just write you a police report so you can get your insurance paid.

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#273

I'm honestly really shocked by how casually people seem to steal these parcels, like what the hell?

As a European, I'm surprised that the postal services in the US just leave the packages outside, rather than ringing the doorbell and/or delivering it to a neighbor. Over here in The Netherlands, pickup points are common (my local groceries store is one), you can choose your delivery time (also in the evening) and they will deliver it to a neighbor when I'm not home. Why not avoid this whole problem with any of these…

You can totally have them delivered to a store for pickup and there's even Amazon Lockers in some places to make it easier. You have to request it though and in most cases you'll have to do that after the package is shipped because Amazon will use whoever is cheapest to ship a particular package.

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#274
post #29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you are stealing the parcels, you gotta have to do it casually, or you'll look suspicious.

Doing it casually or not doesn’t matter when your on camera. The cops won’t do anything with that evidence, so how does it matter?

Don't want people seeing you and calling the cops/following you.

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#275

What are people's thoughts on if this is staged? Considering the views / subscriptions are the main motivation here, it might justify the expenses poured into this project – that is, it would be quite a waste if all that effort went into the build just to have no one actually take it off the porch. If actors were used, it would explain the lack of police involvement (it's easy to say, "police weren't interested" ). A…

(it's easy to say, "police weren't interested" )

It's easy to say, because after a while it kind of just rolls off the tongue. If there's no blood, my experience says police aren't interested. And in some jurisdictions, it better be a lot of blood.

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#276

What are people's thoughts on if this is staged? Considering the views / subscriptions are the main motivation here, it might justify the expenses poured into this project – that is, it would be quite a waste if all that effort went into the build just to have no one actually take it off the porch. If actors were used, it would explain the lack of police involvement (it's easy to say, "police weren't interested" ). A…

most people still seem to think of youtube as home movies. they dont understand its ursurped traditional "television", and all the strings attached to that (its media -- it's not reality! it's a "reality show")

there are many comments here that read something like, "mark wouldn't do a fake video..." as if they know mark personally. it's like debating if tom cruise really shoots people in mission impossible.

you can debate this if you want, maybe mark's followers really do "know" what, how, and why he posts to youtube. but please never stop 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 and questioning

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#277

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm amused by how outraged they are: how could they do this to me? seems to be a common reaction, when of course they did it to themselves.

I appreciated the last person's reaction: to check out the mechanism.

Too bad the fart spray seemed to have ran out at that point. I was waiting for the guy to be sprayed...

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#278
post #270

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>it's easy to say, "police weren't interested" I’ve had my house robbed, and had evidence from the bank when the robbers tried to use the checkbook to send money through Western Union. They had photos, state issued identification, address, etc of the people collecting the payments. The assigned detective would not read an email or respond to voice mails. The detective said he was too busy to read emails. Not sure tha…

You can try to press charges yourself. The police really don't want to help in such cases but I've found that once they know you are serious and have the proper evidence/witnesses they will at least steer you in the right direction.

You can't press charges yourself. You can go directly to the DA with your evidence and hope they press charges, but there is no role for you as a citizen to instigate a criminal preceding.

https://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2015/12/pressing-charges-w...

You could sue them in court.

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#279
post #222

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IANAL... but banks use dye packs. This seems very close to that.

A dye pack is designed to protect the cash by rendering it unusable, not to injure or otherwise affect the person stealing it.

Does glitter cause injury?

Re: Glitter bomb tricks parcel thieves

#280
post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generally because people don't want it. Shipping used to be a lot stricter about signatures, etc, but people usually aren't home when the packages get delivered, and package theft isn't a significant enough problem to make the extra security worth the inconvenience.

> package theft isn't a significant enough problem This guy had his package stolen many times in a short space of time. Seems like the problem is pretty bad?

It was placed in clear view and wasn't in another box so thieves could see it was an expensive(ish at ~$250) and desirable piece of electronics.

Also it's very unclear exactly how long any of this took there's no timestamps on any of the surveillance video. Could have been months.

Post reply on HN