Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Photographs: Removed

removed.social

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 84 posts

Re: Photographs: Removed

#51

Post by akx »

crazygringo wrote: post #42

As an artistic statement this just feels... infantile. Before phones, people were reading books or magazines separately in bed, or reading newspapers on the train. When I traveled to various third-world countries before phones were a thing and people didn't have money for newspapers, people stared blankly out into space on the train or bus or shared van. People weren't social with strangers. In various modern African…

> people stared blankly out into space on the train or bus or shared van [...] boredom was part of everyday life

I wouldn't necessarily call that boredom, not in all cases anyway. Not having the constant ADHD content/info/distraction feed phones provide can be a boon too.

Re: Photographs: Removed

#52

Post by dymk »

21 wrote: post #40
ofrzeta wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is depressing. What's the point of taking another smartphone picture of the Mona Lisa. So they can go home and show or post on some "social" website another smartphone pic of the Mona Lisa? I guess I just don't get it.

That's exactly the point. It's called humble-brag.

Now that's a depressing assumption, that people who want to share their neat experience is just humble-bragging.

Re: Photographs: Removed

#53

Post by bradenb »

hopler wrote: post #49
crazygringo wrote: post #42

As an artistic statement this just feels... infantile. Before phones, people were reading books or magazines separately in bed, or reading newspapers on the train. When I traveled to various third-world countries before phones were a thing and people didn't have money for newspapers, people stared blankly out into space on the train or bus or shared van. People weren't social with strangers. In various modern African…

You seem to be projecting your own feelings onto the pictures. Do you also find nude photographs infantile?

I feel like the OP was making a totally reasonable argument. Your comment was a huge overreaction.

Re: Photographs: Removed

#54

Post by soneca »

An acquaintance of mine became a photographer and also made a collection of people with phones on the streets.

But instead of going for the easy societal critic, he got a more diverse use of phones into his photos.

You can see several occasions where phones were being used as a tool for social, presential, phisycal-world connection between people having a good time.

Worth taking a look:

http://www.thomasfreier.com/fotografia-celular-eles/

Re: Photographs: Removed

#55

Post by ars »

NorthOf33rd wrote: post #34
ars wrote: post #29

I wish they weren't black and white, but otherwise they are very interesting to look at. The black and white takes away a lot of the impact, it's too bad.

Why do you say it takes away the impact? The black and white reads to me as a way to pull out the distractions, to focus only on the form.

To me it takes away all the life from the photo, makes everyone look dead.

It's fine for landscapes, but not for people.

It's you've ever seen a dead body, it's very pale, like a black and white photo.

(It's understandable for old photos before color was possible, but there's really no reason to do it today.)

Re: Photographs: Removed

#56

Post by ars »

jake-low wrote: post #43
ars wrote: post #29

I wish they weren't black and white, but otherwise they are very interesting to look at. The black and white takes away a lot of the impact, it's too bad.

Worth noting that the use of black and white isn't just an Instagram-style filter being applied in Photoshop; the photographer is making these images on black and white film, using a large format camera that's not too different from the ones people were using to take portraits a hundred years ago. You can see a picture of the artist and his camera on this page [0]. [0]: https://www.ericpickersgill.com/about-eric-pick…

Why do that? There is color large format film.

It's one thing if it made the end result better, but it doesn't.

Re: Photographs: Removed

#57

Post by theandrewbailey »

atq2119 wrote: post #45
jiggliemon wrote: post #38

By the title you’d assume these are candid shots of people in real life situations with the phones digitally removed. The actual method the photographer used was to stage situations, and acquire models to act out scenarios for maximum effect. I don’t know how the production of said images will effect the viewer - but I think it’s important to point out - as it does effect the content. This is staged art. This isn’t d…

It's affect, not effect, in this case: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/usage/affect-or-effect (I'm sorry. My English is far from perfect either, I just really stumbled over this one for some reason.)

While that situation is often the case, effect is used correctly as a verb in this context. From your link:

> When used as a verb effect means ‘to bring something about as a result’. It’s most often used in a formal context as oppose to everyday English:

> Growth in the economy can only be effected by stringent economic controls.

> The new policies did little to effect change.

> The prime minister effected many policy changes.

Edit: there are two places were effect is used as a verb in that comment. I'm referring to the last one.

Re: Photographs: Removed

#58

Post by [deleted] »

dymk wrote: post #52
21 wrote: post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's exactly the point. It's called humble-brag.

Now that's a depressing assumption, that people who want to share their neat experience is just humble-bragging.

[deleted]

Re: Photographs: Removed

#59

Post by pelagic_sky »

jiggliemon wrote: post #38

By the title you’d assume these are candid shots of people in real life situations with the phones digitally removed. The actual method the photographer used was to stage situations, and acquire models to act out scenarios for maximum effect. I don’t know how the production of said images will effect the viewer - but I think it’s important to point out - as it does effect the content. This is staged art. This isn’t d…

Thanks, I was looking at the hands and wondering this myself. I would have been a lot more impressed if these were candid shots and then the photographer got images of hands or close likenesses and photographed them in the same positions and then photoshopped them in.

Re: Photographs: Removed

#60

Post by keiferski »

I’ve been getting into the habit of turning my phone off, putting it in a drawer, and leaving it there for as much time as possible.

It sounds absurd, but the results have been fantastic and similar to what I’ve experienced from meditation, long-distance running or similar activities. It’s best described as feeling “grounded”, as if I’m actually alive in the world and not just floating from one room to the next. I end up noticing more about my neighborhood as well, especially irrelevant little things like floor tile patterns or differences between plants on the sidewalk.

My best theory on the topic is: if you only speak one language, the vast majority of internet is essentially a fairly small, uniform, static entity. Whether you log on from Tokyo or Toronto, the software is the same - same colors on Google, same design on Facebook, etc. When you unplug, this uniformity largely disappears and you’re forced to really pay attention to the world around you. As a result, the world feels much bigger.

Post reply on HN