Earlier quoted context omitted.
Libpoppler has poor support for PDF Forms (especially Unicode[1][2]), embedded animation and 3D extensions. In my opinion these areas are very important in real world document exchange to be ignored (as it is a case for PDF FOSS tools). [1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17913 [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/poppler/poppler/issues/463
I have never seen anyone use any of these features in the real world. I presume that embedded animation and 3D extensions are used in art-related fields? If so that would explain my ignorance.
50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
31–40 of 173 posts
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
PDFs are supposed to look the same on every computer. Webpages can’t do that yet.
I don't know how accurate that is for PDF's, but webpages are supposed to look the same, and given known compatible styling, it should be on any modern browser. Browsers are extremely consistent in content presentation, that's why webpages from early 2000s still look the same.
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
PDFs are supposed to look the same on every computer. Webpages can’t do that yet.
I don't know how accurate that is for PDF's, but webpages are supposed to look the same, and given known compatible styling, it should be on any modern browser. Browsers are extremely consistent in content presentation, that's why webpages from early 2000s still look the same.
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
PDFs are supposed to look the same on every computer. Webpages can’t do that yet.
I don't know how accurate that is for PDF's, but webpages are supposed to look the same, and given known compatible styling, it should be on any modern browser. Browsers are extremely consistent in content presentation, that's why webpages from early 2000s still look the same.
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#35Do people still use Adobe reader nowadays? Last time that I tried it in my school's library it took half a minute to load and render my document, and after that the whole UI was unresponsive. I had a much better experience with Sumatra on windows and Zathura on Linux where my documents open almost instantly.
.. tried Zathura on LUbuntu just now for the first time ; appears to be a VIM for documents viewing or something.. no interest in Zathura here!
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#36(home users too, but they can plead ignorance)
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#37If you read the PDF spec from the late 90's, it is Stephen King novel-scary... container format, multiple encodings, encryption, embedded binaries, embedded JavaScript and more.
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#38If you read the PDF spec from the late 90's, it is Stephen King novel-scary... container format, multiple encodings, encryption, embedded binaries, embedded JavaScript and more.
I was under the impression that PDF was created as a response to postscript being "too programmable" and not "document enough" but then they decided that PDF is too minimal and so they ended up bloating it beyond what PostScript ever was by including JavaScript, Flash, and other trash in it.
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was under the impression that PDF was created as a response to postscript being "too programmable" and not "document enough" but then they decided that PDF is too minimal and so they ended up bloating it beyond what PostScript ever was by including JavaScript, Flash, and other trash in it.
It's got a 3d model viewer in it
Re: 50 CVEs in 50 Days: Fuzzing Adobe Reader
#40If you read the PDF spec from the late 90's, it is Stephen King novel-scary... container format, multiple encodings, encryption, embedded binaries, embedded JavaScript and more.
I've done exactly that. Mark my words, a PDF will be the first computer program to gain full sentience.