Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not yet available on Mac it seems.
I wonder if it is possible to subscribe to something to get an update once it's available in any form on Mac?
Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
201–210 of 343 posts
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#202Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#203Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…
As an FF user for decades, esp on Linux, the experience was really poor before the Quantum upgrade. Yes, we lost a lot of plugins, but some of those plugins existed because of FF's legacy code and we are better for it being gone. FF now runs very smooth and uses so much less memory. I actually had Chrome use up all the memory on my 16 gig laptop... it was first for me since I use it so little.
The one thing Chrome does really well is profiles. I have one profile for work, that reopens all pages that were last open. And other for personal viewing in which I don't care. FF's multi account is a plugin and... it's okay for managing multiple social media accounts from one domain, but not good for separating work and play.
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#204Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#205Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…
* No, Chrome isn't the next IE because it doesn't feature proprietary web features
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#206Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting. I guess it may be possible to use it to be logged into and use different email accounts, e.g. foo@emailservice.com and bar@emailservice.com from the same browser instance. That would be helpful.
Yes, you can use it for this (I do) and it works very well.
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#207Earlier quoted context omitted.
You missed Webrender. I switched over the firefox a month ago from chrome. While I had tried doing that a few times over the past few years, i came back to chrome because honestly there was not much difference and chrome just feels like home. This time around I had switched to try out a new tech called 'webrender'. Webrender takes a completely different approach to rendering and compositing, instead of maintainting l…
Not yet available on Mac it seems.
I've been using WebRender as my daily driver on Mac for months now.
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#208Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…
I have never been able to move over to Chrome. Chrome always synces my bookmarks out of place. My bookmarks are how I get things done and run on muscle memory. Because of this I have been a loyal FF user for decades. I tried Chrome again last year and bookmarks still sync out of order. It boggles my mind that Google never fixed this or just isn't a problem for people (do people care?). As an FF user for decades, esp…
I've been a 95% happy Containers user since it was a Test Pilot experiment but there are certainly cases where it's not enough. In my case, not being able to use the mobile device emulator in a container tab was a big pain.
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#209Earlier quoted context omitted.
- Yes, Firefox does support Containers, which are a very innovative privacy feature allowing you to maintain separate browser sessions (cookies, site preferences, ...) towards different websites inside a single browser instance.[1][2] [1] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers#w_what-are-c... [2] https://www.thechiefmeat.com/guides/containers.html
- Yes, Firefox dropped support for remapping keys, an integral UX feature that was present in Super Metroid (SNES, 1992). (Well, that’s not fair, they still support an API for remapping keys that only takes effect after a page tab has loaded.)
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#210Frankly, I don't want to choose firefox. Their priorities are utterly misplaced. I can't believe people don't talk about the dark gtk theming bug more often. It's one of the most common firefox questions on stackoverflow: If you have a dark gtk theme, like Arc-dark or Adwaita-dark, then Firefox randomly colors certain web page elements (usually text boxes) dark to match your desktop theme. Almost always resulting in…
One problem with that, as you note, is web pages that are setting a color but not a background color on elements, which is a web development 101 mistake.
But there's just no way to win here: either you can use the OS theme for widgets and things fail when sites make this mistake, or the widgets don't look "native".