Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not really. People use Pocket. People don't use RSS in their browser.
Market research indicates that most people actually love RSS.
Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
71–80 of 343 posts
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#72Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…
> - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. These are forgivable in my opinion. At least this steps are somehow understandable. What I‘m really miffed about is their partnership with Cliqz. If Google is the devil then Cliqz is Beelzebub. I don‘t understand what they were thinking...
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
> - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. and the removal of RSS support. So much for the champions of the Free Web!
It was removed because - pretty much nobody was using it; - it's pretty easy to reimplement as an extension. Championing the Free Web is harder if you also need to champion the dead web. edit "nobody" => "pretty much nobody"
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#74Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
> - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. These are forgivable in my opinion. At least this steps are somehow understandable. What I‘m really miffed about is their partnership with Cliqz. If Google is the devil then Cliqz is Beelzebub. I don‘t understand what they were thinking...
can you elaborate?
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would someone who actually _knows_ the answer (I know this will not deter the HN-reckon but worth a try) be able to comment on if/why this security gap exists? Is it something fundamental to the different design choices, is it just which has had more test/resources thrown at it, and is the closing of the gap practical and/or on a roadmap?
The Chrome multiprocess isolation model is really good. Firefox devs have known this for ages (heck, there were demos of a version of Firefox 3.x with a similar model), but could not actually land this model for two reasons: - it would break all old-style extensions and users were unhappy about that; - it takes looooots of memory and users were unhappy about that, too. Now that Firefox has dropped all old-style exten…
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. I like Pocket, but I can't see why it shouldn't be an extension that can be removed.
Intellectually, I agree, but - it actually doesn't hurt; - market research indicates that most people actually love it.
I love RSS! I also never used the built in Firefox RSS support because it was not very good. Mozilla also compiled a helpful list of alternative RSS readers for the 0.01% of users that used this feature and made it easy to export your feed list[2].
[1] https://www.gijsk.com/blog/2018/10/firefox-removes-core-prod...
[2] https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/feed-reader-replacement...
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#78Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would someone who actually _knows_ the answer (I know this will not deter the HN-reckon but worth a try) be able to comment on if/why this security gap exists? Is it something fundamental to the different design choices, is it just which has had more test/resources thrown at it, and is the closing of the gap practical and/or on a roadmap?
The Chrome multiprocess isolation model is really good. Firefox devs have known this for ages (heck, there were demos of a version of Firefox 3.x with a similar model), but could not actually land this model for two reasons: - it would break all old-style extensions and users were unhappy about that; - it takes looooots of memory and users were unhappy about that, too. Now that Firefox has dropped all old-style exten…
Re: Choose Firefox Now, or Later You Won't Get a Choice (2014)
#80Just so we can avoid rehashing the discussion whenever a post encouraging the use of Firefox is posted. - Yes, Mozilla is still the better browser when it comes to privacy. - Yes, Mozilla has made missteps with Pocket and Mr. Robot. - Yes, it is slow/resource heavy on certain Macs with non-default resolutions. Yes, Mozilla is working on a fix. - Yes, it has become really fast for most users after Quantum improvements…
What was the misstep with Pocket? I've been loving it since I discovered it thru Firefox.