Earlier quoted context omitted.
Using Google's browser engine still gives them a lot of control, even if you aren't using their trimmings.
True that. I wish they removed all Google stuff from Chromium and only use it in Chrome. Seems like the only fair thing to do imo.
Goodbye, EdgeHTML
141–150 of 679 posts
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#142Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#143Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously, I don’t understand why there are always complaints of Firefox over using CPU when chrome has same issues.
I haven’t had a single perf problem with Chrome. It seems to be related to the platform - I’m on a Mac
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#144Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#145It makes me wonder if at any point in the process Microsoft approached Firefox over integrating their rendering engine vs. Chromium and if so, what the factors were in making their final decision. I also wonder if instead of "ceding" control to Google, Microsoft intends to start being a major contributor to Chromium, so much so that it almost becomes a joint effort vs. Google dominance.
As I understand things, the Mozilla codebase is a much older, vastly more complex and significantly less embedding-friendly environment than WebKit and derivatives. At least from here, it is easy to see why the choice may have in part been technically driven. (I'm a diehard Firefox user but not gonna lie, side-by-side, I'd prefer surfing through WebKit's repos by a long shot!)
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#146Seriously, switch to Firefox. It's good again, and prioritizes privacy.[0] After Chrome's forced-sign-in debacle [1] I switched away from Chrome on all my platforms (Windows, Linux, Android) and haven't missed a thing. [0]: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2018/11/firefox-sync-privacy/ [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18055161
Does it prioritize privacy? I haven't used Firefox in a long time, so my impressions of it are based on news stories, like them launching a partnership with sketchy VPN services or building in "easter egg" advertisements for television shows.
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#147Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same here. I have been been back on FF for a few months and have been very happy. It's fast and works great in every respect. I did experience a glitch the other day in dev tools where a pane blanked out on me. I may have had a crash too, but that's it.
From my experience it's not a glitch, ff Dev tools are slow and second class compared to chrome. Quantum made it viable to use ff on my old laptop, but a daily driver for a web dev it still is not.
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#148I still see zero benefit to me, today , to use Firefox.
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#149If I'm using Safari as my default browser, does it make sense to switch to Firefox just to support them? Interesting that Safari is not coming up in any of these articles as a third competitor, but maybe the fact that it's limited to Mac means it has very small market share.
Safari is awful on the scale of being a 2nd tier browser like IE. It's the browser people use because they don't know any better, or because they don't have any choice. Safari isn't a competitor with Chrome, Firefox, or Edge
edit: As an example, Safari is 2nd after Chrome in this ES7 support comparison: https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es2016plus/
Re: Goodbye, EdgeHTML
#150Seems so sad that Mozilla is literally begging people to give Firefox a try. Even if someone believes that the browser Game of Thrones seems to go to Google, I cannot see how anyone would settle for the second-best choice especially when everything is FREE.. They plainly admit that Firefox can just hold it’s own and it is still NOT the fastest and best browser experience out there. When I launch Chrome I just get thi…
Your security matters. Google recommends using Chrome, a fast and secure browser. Try it?