Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
1–10 of 98 posts
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#2While I fully understand the underlying concept, I don’t understand why so many people seems to be bothered by that anymore; I used to care about that as an Android user, but most of the apps I use everyday on my phone (Twitter, Inbox, Slack, Youtube, even Google Photos or Maps) do not seems to use the pure platform widgets anyway.
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#3> Native widgets: Instead of drawing widgets that look nearly identical to the platform's design, Boden uses native OEM widgets ensuring that your app will always have a truly native look and feel. While I fully understand the underlying concept, I don’t understand why so many people seems to be bothered by that anymore; I used to care about that as an Android user, but most of the apps I use everyday on my phone (Tw…
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#4[0]: https://github.com/ashampoosystems/boden#1-install-xcode
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#5They lost me there. I admit I haven’t done any true C++ in the last few years, bowing at the height of Boost. So I’m curious, did I miss something in the next chapter of “modern” or perhaps the “11” that suddenly made C++ development “easy”?? It was quite capable for sure, but easy, no. Honestly curious. Maybe I’m just not a good enough developer. :/
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#6> Native widgets: Instead of drawing widgets that look nearly identical to the platform's design, Boden uses native OEM widgets ensuring that your app will always have a truly native look and feel. While I fully understand the underlying concept, I don’t understand why so many people seems to be bothered by that anymore; I used to care about that as an Android user, but most of the apps I use everyday on my phone (Tw…
Getting the native look and feel is nice. Using the native widgets had other benefits too, like accessibility for example.
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#7“Boden is written in modern C++11 to make development easy...” They lost me there. I admit I haven’t done any true C++ in the last few years, bowing at the height of Boost. So I’m curious, did I miss something in the next chapter of “modern” or perhaps the “11” that suddenly made C++ development “easy”?? It was quite capable for sure, but easy, no. Honestly curious. Maybe I’m just not a good enough developer. :/
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#8“Boden is written in modern C++11 to make development easy...” They lost me there. I admit I haven’t done any true C++ in the last few years, bowing at the height of Boost. So I’m curious, did I miss something in the next chapter of “modern” or perhaps the “11” that suddenly made C++ development “easy”?? It was quite capable for sure, but easy, no. Honestly curious. Maybe I’m just not a good enough developer. :/
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#9> Native widgets: Instead of drawing widgets that look nearly identical to the platform's design, Boden uses native OEM widgets ensuring that your app will always have a truly native look and feel. While I fully understand the underlying concept, I don’t understand why so many people seems to be bothered by that anymore; I used to care about that as an Android user, but most of the apps I use everyday on my phone (Tw…
Re: Boden cross-platform framework: Native C++11, native widgets, no JavaScript
#10“Boden is written in modern C++11 to make development easy...” They lost me there. I admit I haven’t done any true C++ in the last few years, bowing at the height of Boost. So I’m curious, did I miss something in the next chapter of “modern” or perhaps the “11” that suddenly made C++ development “easy”?? It was quite capable for sure, but easy, no. Honestly curious. Maybe I’m just not a good enough developer. :/
Yes, C++11 added Smart Pointers and Lambdas, which made development a lot easier, among other stuff.
And decent date and time management