I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
1–10 of 151 posts
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#2A response to “We are Google employees, Google must drop DragonFly”
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#3This is probably the first time I see something from a concerned Chinese citizen.
I applaud this truthfully, it also gave me an alternative view about ( why) entering the market and what some Chinese think.
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#4wow. someone defending google and the main point is that their Advertising Business is less predatory than Baidu's?!
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#5China can allow access to Google whenever they choose.
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#6You must not use "Must", just let DragonFly die, use true google or stick with Baidu, in the meantime feel grateful that github.com is still accessible.
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#7China can allow access to Google whenever they choose.
But they won't. And that has real consequences for actual people. Google has the option to improve those people's lives by going there, even if it means bowing to the demands of Chinese censors. Nothing is gained by staying out. China isn't going to magically change its opinion on censorship because Google won't enter their market. The objections of the Google employees are shortsighted and naive.
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#8You must not use "Must", just let DragonFly die, use true google or stick with Baidu, in the meantime feel grateful that github.com is still accessible.
So your solution to the Chinese people that wants alternative is to just pray? There is no easy way to "use true google", so not really an option. The situation is mostly the government's fault, the people just want options, any options would be better than nothing.
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#9A response to “We are Google employees, Google must drop DragonFly”
Re: I’m Chinese, Google’s DragonFly Must Go On
#10If we counted the number of people the PRC has killed by finding them through their "great" firewall, does the OP think that number is less than bad baidu medical ads?
I don't understand is the false equivalency between baidu's advertising and PRC's notorious human rights violations.
This post doesn't address any of the concerns brought up by the original letter they decry?