Live data from Hacker News

Spectrum is joining GitHub

spectrum.chat

91–100 of 155 posts

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#91
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And Skype. And Lync.

Lync is now Skype for Business... I mean in the splash and window title because the executable is still "lync.exe".

Ah, Skype for Business. Which can't actually call other Skype accounts, and requires a desktop executable if you want clients to be able to call you. Meaning it is neither "Skype" nor is it useful "for business".

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#92

I didn't know Spectrum until today. It looks similar to Gitter. As I understand it, it means we now have at least three “slack-like”, well-backed, open-source, community-centered chats: - Gitter, now owned by GitLab; - Spectrum, now owned by GitHub; - Mattermost, independent, but fully integrated within GitLab. That's great to have credible alternatives to the proprietary behemots that are Slack, Discord and others,…

There is so riot.im which is built on top of Matrix.org (which was built for federation and E2E encryption). There are already IRC and Discord bridges to matrix. Riot is being deployed as the govt chat infrastructure for 5 million users in France. The SaaS version is modular.im (much cheaper than slack)

I used riot.im as my primary IRC client (via its IRC bridge) from home, work, and on mobile, for a year or so. Unfortunately there were lots of issues and bugs, to the point where I couldn't trust that when I wrote someone a message they would get it, or vice versa, so I had to give up on it. I'm now a happy IRCCloud user.

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#95

I really like Spectrum, I tried to get other people to join it but my "friends" are always stuck on Discord and Reddit. So finally, I only lurk it occasionally. However I don't understand why GitHub would acquire Spectrum: what do they have to win from this? Doesn't GitHub already have their own "forums" for communities per Git org? I tried to use these git forums/board ( https://github.com/orgs/lnug/teams/ ), sadly…

I don't know of any forums built into GitHub? They have issues and the wiki, but that's as much as I've ever used/heard of.

Organisations have a "conversation" feature. Personally I've never found it particularly useful.

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#96

I didn't know Spectrum until today. It looks similar to Gitter. As I understand it, it means we now have at least three “slack-like”, well-backed, open-source, community-centered chats: - Gitter, now owned by GitLab; - Spectrum, now owned by GitHub; - Mattermost, independent, but fully integrated within GitLab. That's great to have credible alternatives to the proprietary behemots that are Slack, Discord and others,…

I like Gitter, the Scala community is on Gitter. However I wish they'd fix their IRC bridge, which has some issues, like not reporting the full list of users, which is driving me insane. Speaking of Slack-like, the best alternative remains in my opinion good old IRC. I'm a user of https://irccloud.com for always-on presence on IRC and it has better clients than Gitter.

Gitter has this annoying bug where it'll email you for every message in any channel you're in and you can't turn it off. How such an egregious bug still hasn't been fixed, I don't know, but it doesn't inspire much trust.

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or the other Spectrum, formed from the merger of Time Warner Cable and Charter.

> Every feature of Spectrum is now free. Let's just pretend we're confused.

I don't think that's pretending at this point

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#98
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lync is now Skype for Business... I mean in the splash and window title because the executable is still "lync.exe".

Ah, Skype for Business. Which can't actually call other Skype accounts, and requires a desktop executable if you want clients to be able to call you. Meaning it is neither "Skype" nor is it useful "for business".

Reminds me of the joke about the "Holy Roman Empire."

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#99

I am curious how it is not a trademark infringement? Can someone please explain? Skype was sued in UK for using letters "S,K,Y" by brand "Sky" and lost [1] [1] - https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-32593735

That's so ridiculous! This is the hypothetical confusion scenario: "Oh I want to waste a tonne of money watching sports and uglify my house with a dish. Ah Skype! They do that, I'll call them up and get an install done this week." Calls them up and Skype taking advantage of the trademark confusion pocket some money from their Skype dish installation.

Re: Spectrum is joining GitHub

#100
The first time I loaded this, I got an error, “We couldn’t find a channel with this name.” In the console, ServiceWorker errors on Google Analytics (blocked), and a bunch of unhelpful “Unhandled (in react-apollo)” errors with long stack traces that I shan’t reproduce here. A reload fixed it. Curious and a little concerning. But even then, the document has no title or favicon, which is… what!? (OK, when I looked back five minutes later, after much scrolling through several pages of comments at the end, it did eventually get a document title, but only eventually.)

The big image at the top of https://spectrum.chat/features is also broken.

Post reply on HN