Earlier quoted context omitted.
If someone is publicly saying questionable things about your organization, then trying to find out what their motivations might be by doing research is just common sense (especially if the company in question is publicly traded). So I'm with you there, I don't get the outrage here at all. It comes off as cheap and manufactured from what I'm seeing.
Everyone should read his comments[0] about Facebook and Google, before you criticize the guy. > what their motivations might be by doing research is just common sense The rhetoric that you guys use, especially when you talk about someone who's probably as genuinely committed to a civil, liberal world as George Soros: you sound like a South Park character. You can watch a clip that uses conspiratorial rhetoric (and ma…
Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
81–90 of 98 posts
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#82>told subordinates to examine why Mr. Soros had criticized the tech companies and whether he stood to gain financially from the attacks. Well, he is an investor who has a history of causing financial damage to whole countries by betting against their currencies. So, it shouldn't be surprising FB would want to know what might be in store for them if he went nuclear on them. What is surprising is the odd bedfellows of…
When the NYT first published "Delay, Deny and Deflect" [1], Sandberg pretended she didn't know anything about it and promised to investigate. Later, she claimed the investigation turned up emails about Facebook's deceptive practices that "crossed her desk" [2], but made it sound like her involvement was peripheral and incidental. Naturally, now we learn those were all lies, and she was personally involved the entire…
Ms. Sandberg [...] asked for the information in an email to a senior executive in January[...]. The email came within days of a blistering speech Mr. Soros delivered that month at the World Economic Forum, attacking Facebook and Google as a “menace” to society and calling for the companies to be regulated.
This seems like a pretty reasonable reaction. As far as I understand this has nothing to do with Definers.Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#83Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#84We flag the story about Google employees discussing censoring conservative news sources but we push this story about Facebook to the front page? The intellectual dishonesty here is astounding.
I don't know what story you're talking about, but if you think flagging is being abused, let us know at hn@ycombinator.com so we can take a look at it.
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
What business did he sell before Facebook?
Probably referring to the Synapse Media Player, which had a million-dollar buyout offer from Microsoft while Zuckerburg was in high school. IIRC he didn't actually sell it though; it was still a going project under Zuckerburg's control when he created FB, and just kinda died out because FB held more potential.
I forgot that he didn't actually end up selling. He did come very close to selling to Microsoft, though.
Here's a bit about it: https://www.revealingthestuffs.com/mark-zuckerbergs-synapse-...
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
When the NYT first published "Delay, Deny and Deflect" [1], Sandberg pretended she didn't know anything about it and promised to investigate. Later, she claimed the investigation turned up emails about Facebook's deceptive practices that "crossed her desk" [2], but made it sound like her involvement was peripheral and incidental. Naturally, now we learn those were all lies, and she was personally involved the entire…
I'm not sure what "this" you're referring to is, but assuming it's Definers: where did you learn she was involved the entire time? This article says: Ms. Sandberg [...] asked for the information in an email to a senior executive in January[...]. The email came within days of a blistering speech Mr. Soros delivered that month at the World Economic Forum, attacking Facebook and Google as a “menace” to society and calli…
You know, like targeting Facebook users who are racist and anti-Semitic with disinfo about George Soros, while simultaneously telling Jewish users that Facebook's critics are themselves anti-Semitic.
FTFA, first paragraph:
Sheryl Sandberg was directly involved in the social media company’s effort to conduct opposition research against billionaire philanthropist George Soros...
...reporting contradicts Sandberg’s previous portrayals of her involvement; she has said she was unaware of the campaign-style communications work done by Republican public relations firm Definers Public Affairs
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#87>told subordinates to examine why Mr. Soros had criticized the tech companies and whether he stood to gain financially from the attacks. Well, he is an investor who has a history of causing financial damage to whole countries by betting against their currencies. So, it shouldn't be surprising FB would want to know what might be in store for them if he went nuclear on them. What is surprising is the odd bedfellows of…
> Well, he is an investor who has a history of causing financial damage to whole countries by betting against their currencies. So you're judging him on the fact that he plays Forex and short? If they didn't want that then it should be made illegal. This is a dubious statement.
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
>fails the "beer test" with basically everybody in America. Sounds nailed on to be the DNC nominee then.
Eh? Obama, Kerry, Bill Clinton... I'd say they all pass the beer test with flying colours. Obviously the exception here is Hillary Clinton. But I do wonder about the gender component of the beer test - while she was seen as aloof and alienating a lot of women didn't see Hillary that way.
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the outrage is implicit in the the publication of the article. Why is this in the New York Times? He criticized the company, she asked is he had a financial interest behind the criticism. Okay? Why is this a story?
She did previously deny knowing about the PR company doing the oppo research on Soros... generally when there's a denial at a high level and then contradictory evidence comes out, it's newsworthy. It's not airtight evidence that she lied, just more of a glaring red flag that a closer look might be warranted.
Re: Sheryl Sandberg Is Said to Have Asked Facebook Staff to Research George Soros
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think the outrage is implicit in the the publication of the article. Why is this in the New York Times? He criticized the company, she asked is he had a financial interest behind the criticism. Okay? Why is this a story?
> Why is this a story? Because George Soros is a lightning rod for the alt-right and NWO conspiracy theorists.