Live data from Hacker News

How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

blog.nanonets.com

21–30 of 35 posts

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#21

We at Nanonets have been building a lot of Machine Learning models for drone based image analysis. A frequent request from our customers is how do they use our models to do real time analysis. So we decided to create a how to on building real time object detection using a DJI drone. Also useful if you're just looking to get the video stream to your laptop/computer.

Awesome, was looking for something like this. Will definitely try it out. What rate (fps) were you able to process the stream at?

If you really want this at low latency, you can also take the hdmi output of the dji controller and plug it into a capture card.

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#22

Has anyone attempted to do anything like this for SAR (Search and Resuce)? I”m not sure where one would gather a good dataset for training a model.

Probably, I know of at least one project https://liu.se/en/news-item/har-testas-autonom-sjoraddning-i...

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#23
post #20
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is no way it can be stopped. Most of the development is secret and much further along than people believe. I think we need to regain community control over those who possess this technology - it will be deployed whether we like it or not. And, even more frightening, whoever deploys it first wins, and it will be so effective that it can no longer be defeated. This issue is more serious than global warming, jobs,…

Infantry weapons powered by the kind of computer vision and facial recognition AI easily demonstrable today would be incredibly frightening, no matter how they were used. Of course there's no way of stopping this in an adversarial world. Surely it would only be a matter of choosing to increase the efforts for a year or so in order to take these weapons from proof-of-concept to highly effective. E.g. autonomous flying…

I agree with you. But I think there is a bigger "weapon". When dust size monitoring is pervasive, how can anyone acquire weapons or coordinate any resistance? Dust is everywhere. And teams of nano-weapons can kill people (this has been reported as research for well over a decade, so anyone could reasonably assume that unreported research has gotten a lot further.) You don't need armies when nobody can effectively fight you or even acquire or build any weapon of any sort. So I don't worry as much about WW3 - since WW3 can be prevented with the pervasive monitoring technology on the near horizon. (There may be a WW3, but we have bigger problems coming up.)

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#25
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey MrTonyD. I understand where your coming from. But honestly most people are using this for monitoring things like Solar Panels, Wind Turbines, detecting seals and crop prediction. We can't have a sustainable future without a lot of these technologies in place. https://nanonets.com/drone/wind-turbines/ https://nanonets.com/drone/solar-panels/ All new technology will have some deviant use case associated with it. Th…

Well, I'm 60 now and I've worked in Silicon Valley for over 40 years. So I guess I hear about all the other uses of such technology. I've worked with NSA, CIA, DIA, all the branches of military, and a bunch of people who don't officially exist. So, while there are definitely things I can't say, I will say that the "dust sensors" have been in use for many years, and I'm not describing anything theoretical. We need to…

Yeah, they worked amazingly well at stopping some terrorists.

Let's see them stop me from procuring a weapon.

FFS, even my ISP is more of a problem than dust sensors.

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#26
post #23
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Infantry weapons powered by the kind of computer vision and facial recognition AI easily demonstrable today would be incredibly frightening, no matter how they were used. Of course there's no way of stopping this in an adversarial world. Surely it would only be a matter of choosing to increase the efforts for a year or so in order to take these weapons from proof-of-concept to highly effective. E.g. autonomous flying…

I agree with you. But I think there is a bigger "weapon". When dust size monitoring is pervasive, how can anyone acquire weapons or coordinate any resistance? Dust is everywhere. And teams of nano-weapons can kill people (this has been reported as research for well over a decade, so anyone could reasonably assume that unreported research has gotten a lot further.) You don't need armies when nobody can effectively fig…

When the map starts to reach the same size as the territory, don't you then need a map for the map? Pervasive monitoring sounds like one hell of a dataset to search through. Sure, you can use it to follow things you have already identified, but just because you have recorded something, doesn't mean that you know that you have recorded it.

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#27
post #9

Wow. Combine this with the ability to drop some of the latest nano-sensors (atoms strung together to build dust-sized sensors and batteries and power at scale), and we should be able to monitor absolutely everything everywhere. Let's see anyone even try to object to my rules or procure a weapon! And given some on-board weapons, we would never have to worry about civil unrest again. Only people grateful for the food a…

Flip that around, and anyone with $1k, some time on their hands and an internet connection can build a flying killbot with facial recognition. Which is equally bad.

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#28
post #23
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Infantry weapons powered by the kind of computer vision and facial recognition AI easily demonstrable today would be incredibly frightening, no matter how they were used. Of course there's no way of stopping this in an adversarial world. Surely it would only be a matter of choosing to increase the efforts for a year or so in order to take these weapons from proof-of-concept to highly effective. E.g. autonomous flying…

I agree with you. But I think there is a bigger "weapon". When dust size monitoring is pervasive, how can anyone acquire weapons or coordinate any resistance? Dust is everywhere. And teams of nano-weapons can kill people (this has been reported as research for well over a decade, so anyone could reasonably assume that unreported research has gotten a lot further.) You don't need armies when nobody can effectively fig…

Catharsis. I had been suspicious of similar things since early 2000s, thinking that the technology must be there. Surprised how only-ok sensors were while at research institutions (I avoided career paths even adjacent to military per principle).

Perhaps this is naive: One matter I never hear of, and is underestimated is automation of the legal system, and its equalizing effect. I have high hopes for it, although to be fair, our society is as unequal as we are. But those who cannot win the battle will have everything they need. And those who never have enough will be put in their places, and ideally technologists and scientists can take over from politicians, if we aren't automated ourselves. Then I wish to submit a request for democratization of computing power to the legal skynet, which grants it, and that in theory gives me my freedom as much as a gun claims it does. I should be able to own dust sensors to monitor intruding dust sensors. High hopes.

Some people make fun of elon musk for mars, but he has a point.

But thanks for turning my fanthom chills into real ones. The downvotes are from those who believe otherwise, which is not bad at all to see.

I wanted to mention something about certain areas of research on similar grounds, but I am not topping dust sensors by a long shot. Although my suspicions are probably correct then.

Again, I am probably on the naive-spectrum, but deep down, I feel if I don't ever go after money, I'll have less of a say in how the world plays out, and I am more fair than most I know, so I have a responsibility (I currently do research for research's sake, attic-style, and unfortunately I am only moderately bright, but bright enough to see through the facade where I am living that many many things only exist and function so the rich may remain rich, despite new technologies).

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#29
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you. But I think there is a bigger "weapon". When dust size monitoring is pervasive, how can anyone acquire weapons or coordinate any resistance? Dust is everywhere. And teams of nano-weapons can kill people (this has been reported as research for well over a decade, so anyone could reasonably assume that unreported research has gotten a lot further.) You don't need armies when nobody can effectively fig…

When the map starts to reach the same size as the territory, don't you then need a map for the map? Pervasive monitoring sounds like one hell of a dataset to search through. Sure, you can use it to follow things you have already identified, but just because you have recorded something, doesn't mean that you know that you have recorded it.

I think self-censorship itself is a problem. Just knowing that there are sensors around, many may remain silent.

Re: How to Do Real Time Object Detection on Drones

#30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree with you. But I think there is a bigger "weapon". When dust size monitoring is pervasive, how can anyone acquire weapons or coordinate any resistance? Dust is everywhere. And teams of nano-weapons can kill people (this has been reported as research for well over a decade, so anyone could reasonably assume that unreported research has gotten a lot further.) You don't need armies when nobody can effectively fig…

When the map starts to reach the same size as the territory, don't you then need a map for the map? Pervasive monitoring sounds like one hell of a dataset to search through. Sure, you can use it to follow things you have already identified, but just because you have recorded something, doesn't mean that you know that you have recorded it.

Some people wonder why Cloudera (Hadoop and now Spark) had such high stock prices. But the real investors and the real clients were not public. Now, we all know that these systems are limited both in data volume and ability to run all the Machine Learning algorithms - but this problem is looking more and more solvable - and there are many who are trying outside of the public eye.
Post reply on HN