Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
1–10 of 601 posts
Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#2Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#3Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#4Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#5Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#6Accruing technical debt was a process feature. More bad code that everyone is afraid to touch means more budget for terrified developers and testers, and insane networked database design means more budget for servers and sysops. The fear leads to meetings, the meetings lead to suffering, and suffering leads to the dark side. It still works according to spec, and is human-fixed quickly whenever it doesn't, but the poor quality of the codebase is likely costing at least $2 million per year.
Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#7Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#8Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#9In my opinion, if it works, and provides the utility it was designed to bring, then it doesn't matter. If it makes money, then who really cares!
Re: Ask HN: What's the largest amount of bad code you have ever seen work?
#10Excel is an incomprehensible maze of #defines and macros, PowerPoint is a Golden Temple of overly-object-oriented insanity, and Word is just so old and brittle you'd expect it to turn to dust by committing. There are "don't touch this!"-like messages left near the main loop _since roughly 1990_.
I had a bug in some IME code causing a popup to draw behind a window occasionally, and a Windows guru had to come in to figure it out by remote-debugging the windows draw code with no symbols.
I learned there that people can make enormous and powerful castles from, well, shit.