Live data from Hacker News

Medium is a poor choice for blogging

medium.com

131–140 of 396 posts

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#131

Sometimes I read articles like this and think I'm past it. It's like the whole web has turned in to this pool of mud and no-one realises what it was like before. A blog is a text file on a screen. There's really no need to do it on a proprietary system, you can literally upload a text file to your own host, but if you can't be bothered, somewhere like GitHub Pages. You want an image? Here's a tag: If the idea is that…

Yes, this a thousand times. One example, Dan Luu [1] gets this absolutely right . His blog would probably look similar on Lynx, or any text-only browser, yet is better than 99.99% of stuff "out there". [1] https://danluu.com/

Dan Luu's blog is almost there, but personally I'd prefer if there was just a tiny bit of CSS that capped the width of the text. With full width paragraphs, it's not the most pleasant to read.

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#132
post #106

I'm glad the author mentioned the thing that I dislike most about Medium: the "share" tooltip that appears any time you highlight anything in the article. I realize that they consider this a value prop (and it certainly hasn't hurt their ability to grow) but for those of us who highlight text as we read, it's incredibly annoying.

It's very annoying, but thankfully reader mode in every browser gets rid of it and every other annoyance medium has, including popups.

Reader mode is definitely a very important part of the modern web experience. A rather sad truth.

I recently also found a Firefox extension [1] I'd been looking for a some time: a way to automatically enter reader mode on some URLs, such as medium.com. This makes browsing Medium much nicer.

[1] https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/automatic-rea...

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#133

It's funny, because some years ago when Medium blogs were starting to be posted left and right, people were praising the interface, and nobody listened to the few who objected. Now, we need all kinds of tricks, add-ons and blocks to just read five-minute posts during our commute. It's 2018, and there are a gazillion ways to get yourself in control of your stuff. The next free framework that comes, which promises a cl…

Depending on how simple you want it, you could just use MarkDeep, TexMe or MdMe plus something like NeoCities or a Github repo. You'd miss out on some benefits of a full generator, like automatically creating an archive page and RSS feeds and stuff like that, but you'd gain that 90's simplicity. [0] https://casual-effects.com/markdeep/ [1] https://github.com/susam/texme [2] https://github.com/susam/mdme [3] https://n…

Man, I remember finding markdeep a while ago and I've been looking for it. Thanks for the link

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#134
I don't think anyone should be locked into a specific blogging platform and should own their content 100%.

WordPress has been my blogging platform of choice for years but, I've tried many different platforms and ultimately ended up returning back to a platform (ORG) in which I could have total control over.

I've also built a tool (https://scribewp.com/) which allows me to now write my blog posts in any text editor I prefer and later I can sync a markdown file to a posts or page in WordPress. This has improved my productivity and I own my content 100%. While medium is a great platform, there is too much noise going on when reading a blog post.

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#135
post #84

I hate modern web. Every site nowdays filled with bright/flashing/wobbling/jumping buttons, modal windows, pinned bars covering 1/3 of the content (or 2/3 on my phone in landscape mode) and asking me to install Yet Another Special App to view site. But I already have app for viewing sites - damn web browser. Browser can even open different pages in different tabs. Or even different sites in different tabs, unbelievab…

No it won't

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#137

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm expecting downvotes, but self hosted wordpress could work for you.

Unfortunately you got downvoted because HN is obsessed with static site generators. Meanwhile, Wordpress offers a superior writing and reading experience which you, the owner, totally control.

Or perhaps less conspiratorially, complaining about votes is against the guidelines here and pretty much guarantees an automatic downvote from a lot of people. As in this case, it never achieves anything other than derailing the conversation.

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#138

I don't think anyone should be locked into a specific blogging platform and should own their content 100%. WordPress has been my blogging platform of choice for years but, I've tried many different platforms and ultimately ended up returning back to a platform (ORG) in which I could have total control over. I've also built a tool ( https://scribewp.com/ ) which allows me to now write my blog posts in any text editor…

The problem is not only how much how a blogging platform owns your blog, but also that it owns the viewer's eyeballs. From the moment the viewer reads your blog, the platform has power over the viewer.

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#139

It's funny, because some years ago when Medium blogs were starting to be posted left and right, people were praising the interface, and nobody listened to the few who objected. Now, we need all kinds of tricks, add-ons and blocks to just read five-minute posts during our commute. It's 2018, and there are a gazillion ways to get yourself in control of your stuff. The next free framework that comes, which promises a cl…

> It's 2018, and there are a gazillion ways to get yourself in control of your stuff. But zero ways to get people to read it. I only read his post because it's on HN. And I read Medium stuff regularly on Medium. The chances of most people discovering some random blog? Not so much. Whereas Medium has concentrated eyeballs and knows their preferences to serve them stuff that's close to their tastes...

Our data doesn't support that.

Most of our traffic comes from hackernews, reddit and similar. However because our blog is too niche?

https://medium.com/@buckaroo.pm

Re: Medium is a poor choice for blogging

#140
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

reminds me of all the snarky/satrical comments along the lines of iphone is the worst phone ever! -sent from my iPhone from a decade ago

Is anyone aware that using code formatting for non-code is extremely annoying because, on mobile, it’s almost impossible to read because of the necessity to side scroll.

> using code formatting for non-code is extremely annoying

Even for code it is annoying because of the wide margins. The margins take up about 50% of the width of the screen (!)

Post reply on HN