China's AI news anchors
11–20 of 115 posts
Re: China's AI news anchors
#12Oh how about the new buzzword anchor??
Re: China's AI news anchors
#13Re: China's AI news anchors
#14>> The English-speaking anchor, complete with a suit and tie, is modeled on a real-life Xinhua anchor called Zhang Zhao. I hope that Zhang Zhao is getting a licensing stream for the use of his likeness. William Gibson was really ahead of his time when he popularized "synthetic personality constructs" as a mainstream literary trope[1]. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idoru
Re: China's AI news anchors
#15China's track record with free speech makes the implications of completely bypassing any human 'journalist' kind of scary. I guess it's always been possible, but damn.
Honestly, I don't see a lot of difference between them and the way Sean Hannity blatantly takes the Trump line. The difference is that in the US, there's diversity of press and so diversity of opinions. I'm not confident there was ever diversity of press in China in the first place, so I'm not sure how much this changes. Maybe if the entire press cycle gets completely automated with no human oversight at all, OK. But I imagine there will always be human oversight, just because they don't want things to go off the rails. That's what happens right now.
And if we reach the singularity, I'm sure an AI would have more guts to stand up and say what's on their mind than a human would.
Re: China's AI news anchors
#16My first thought was towards Max Headroom. My second thought was on the Max Headroom incident. If it went live, how long before a copy lands in the hands of pranksters?
Thinking on that... someone could use it to declare a revolution, or say claim a disaster has happened.
Re: China's AI news anchors
#17England created Max Headroom before America’s MTV took it over
Re: China's AI news anchors
#18Re: China's AI news anchors
#19American statists must be salivating at the prospect of having an army of those bots...
Re: China's AI news anchors
#20China's track record with free speech makes the implications of completely bypassing any human 'journalist' kind of scary. I guess it's always been possible, but damn.