Why is there 15MB limit. I would love to use it on Linux kernel development. The tree is huge. Can it handle that?
I just added a 30-day money back guarantee.
141–150 of 193 posts
Why is there 15MB limit. I would love to use it on Linux kernel development. The tree is huge. Can it handle that?
I just added a 30-day money back guarantee.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
That can lead to ("Work", "Worry", "Word") so you'd then have to type the 'k'. Now you could have ("Work", "Worker", "Worked") and still are missing the variant you want. It'd be nice to long press "Work" at step one, get that completed without a space being inserted, then tap 'i' to get ("Working", "Workings", "Workingmen")
It turns out that iOS prediction will make a provisional guess based on what you typed and will go back and adjust its autocorrections as you type subsequent words. You can see this more clearly if you use dictation, but allegedly it won't do as well if you use the word corrections every time.
What I fear is that the autocomplete can reveal my NSFW jargon. It’s the same keyboard even when Safari is in Private Mode, right?
I've prototyped something like this in the past using n-grams and it was surprisingly effective. When I think it gets really interesting is if you marry ML/NLP tactics with traditional static code analysis. So you can imagine the ML engine generating the suggestions with the static analyzer ranking the suggestions intelligently. It's kind of similar to the original AlphaGo where you have the model generate the potent…
Played with free for a bit, 200KB is quite a bit low, didn't get any completions. Purchased the premium licence. Gotta say stripe integration is very smooth. Overall after a couple of hours of playing with this. My mind is quite blown away. This is absolutely amazing. Hopefully Microsoft or someone acquires this technology for a fat sum and open sources it. I've thought about code completion smarts for a long time. Y…
Did you see much improvement in the suggestions after purchasing and using the larger index?
$30 is a pretty cheap price for a pattern based completion engine.
It’s the first time I’ve seen it work well. It was completing fairly long statements and I was pleasantly surprised how close the first few results were to what I wanted.
The whole configurationless, all language completion using pattern analysis and fast index lookups in a very easy to install delivery is great execution.
This are the kinds of little small things that make me think “why didn’t I do this?”
I wish the author gave, 30 day free premium trial. A lot people would be willing to spend on the license IMHO.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
To allow the person(s) who implemented it to get paid for their efforts and hard work?
It's also a very competitive price. $29 is excellent for a piece of software that helps my day to day. It's really a sweet spot between very reasonable, and a bit pricey. I'm so happy about this project, and hope it works well (I'll be trying it tonight after work)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
...as risky as installing a proprietary editor plugin which updates automatically, yes. Also, AFAIK most understandings of MIT, BSD, and Apache 2.0 licenses require you to acknowledge the copyright holders of the source code you compile into your binary, even if the licenses permit binary distribution. I can't find your "Copyright (c) 2018 Tokio Contributors" or "Copyright (c) 2014 The Rust Project Developers" that I…
MIT only requires source attribution. It's the BSD licenses that require attribution for binary forms of redistribution. Still, it is good manners and good cover-your-arse practice to attribute whatever free software work they used (Google does this with their giant "open source licenses" page).
> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
It's up to a court to decide what "copies or substantial portions of the Software" means.
Personally, I've always very much interpreted that to mean both binary and source.