Live data from Hacker News

Academia is a cult?

washingtonpost.com

91–100 of 135 posts

Re: Academia is a cult?

#91
post #40

Seems like this should be titled "Humanities Academia is a cult". Which is a conclusion with which I don't necessarily disagree. Frankly, the job numbers are out there. If you choose to get a PhD in history even after seeing them, you're probably delusional in some form. I'm not so certain about STEM however. While cults can pop up anywhere there is a leader with a non trivial power dynamic, I'd say that a fair porti…

Music academia is terrible and riddled with politics and infighting from my experience also. The number of actual livable jobs for classical musicians are very low. It makes me pissed off how public schools will still spend hundred of thousands of dollars and push kids into classical music when it is such a dead end, and competition is so high. It is a ponzi scheme where the students pay the teachers, then the studen…

[deleted]

Re: Academia is a cult?

#92
post #83

I don't know the source but I first read the following useful distinction here in HN: The difference between a cult and a religion: a cult wants it all, a religion just wants its cut.

All religions started out as a cult. Christianity was a cult until it won.

The difference between a cult and religion is the same as the difference between a molehill and a hill. It's hard to say exactly when a molehill turns into a hill, but you'll know it when it does.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What would be your theory ?

Hah, I thought it would be funny to add that "left as an exercise to the reader" bit, a habit from my Math days. Two things. First, reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer college level skills. That combined with computers means that the bar for government clerical work is much, much lower. The result is that in the 1920s a Philosophy grad would be extremely useful to a county government because of their gener…

>> First, reading, writing, and arithmetic are no longer college level skills. That combined with computers means that the bar for government clerical work is much, much lower.

Which probably explains why most public services are FUBAR and stuffed full of incompetent idiots.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#94
The same thing affecting academia ( mostly humanities ) is the same thing affecting journalism. Instead of being institutions for seeking truth and knowledge, they've become institutions of political advocacy and agenda.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#95
post #84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They aren’t underpaid. Tenured professors have the ultimate job security. They also get paid sabbaticals which is fairly rare in the real world. Adjunct professors on the other hand — those are definitely underpaid, but they’re often doing that work as a side job or they’re trying to fight their way to tenure. A job from which you can’t be fired? That’s worth something. Stellar benefits? That’s worth something as wel…

Every post-doc position is wildly over-subscribed and there is fierce competition for each one. So simple economics - the law of supply and demand - says they are not underpaid, in fact if anything they are paid over the clearing price for the market.

You're under the mistaken impression that there is a free market for postdoc positions. Postdoc salaries are fixed by government salary level tables and postdoc positions are opened as part of a planned economy. Plans range from 5 to 10 years.

Moreover, universities are not companies and could not possibly be run like companies, and foundational research usually does not produce any consumable products. The effects of foundational research on economy are soften only noticeable years or decades later, sometimes (like in mathematics) centuries later. Regarding publications in foundational research as "products" is highly misleading, they contribute to a net effect in science that can hardly be quantified.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#96

I prefer to think of it as more of a MLM or pyramid scheme than a cult.

MLM you say? Ok, let me see - peddling in private homes (friends and family)? check! - using social connections as marketing channel (classmates, friends and family)? check! - promising benefits, while customers have to pay upfront and wait years for see their investment (never) pay off? check! - turning customers to promoters (work environments turn away applicants without XYZ degree)? check! - kick-back/ROI is dist…

Any political party checks all those boxes.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#97

Yes, humanities academia is severely flawed, not only in the ways that the author describes but also in the prevalence of pseudo-intellectual quackery in literature studies, cultural studies and areas of social sciences, philosophy, etc. The newspaper appears to have forgotten to qualify the title to make clear that they were not talking about all academia.

A lot of biomedical science is also barely worth of the name science as it's not reproducible. And I'm sure you could find the same in physics and math too. But it's way easier to look at the humanities, not being able to understand the language used due to not having the required background and go "clearly it's worthless because I, someone with a degree in a completely different field, cannot understand it". And the…

Great comment. Oh, only problem is I do understand the language used, I do have the required background and I don’t point at the Sokal affair.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#98

Yes, humanities academia is severely flawed, not only in the ways that the author describes but also in the prevalence of pseudo-intellectual quackery in literature studies, cultural studies and areas of social sciences, philosophy, etc. The newspaper appears to have forgotten to qualify the title to make clear that they were not talking about all academia.

A lot of biomedical science is also barely worth of the name science as it's not reproducible. And I'm sure you could find the same in physics and math too. But it's way easier to look at the humanities, not being able to understand the language used due to not having the required background and go "clearly it's worthless because I, someone with a degree in a completely different field, cannot understand it". And the…

Reproducibility is a desirable quality but ultimately neither necessary nor sufficient for science.

Re: Academia is a cult?

#99

> It’s not unusual for academic job seekers to spend 10 percent of their annual income — the amount of a tithe — attending a single conference for an interview (including airfare, lodging, registration fees and incidentals). You can tell the author legitimately knows humanities academia from the inside because they are experts at pointing out unrelated coincidental facts as if their simultaneous truth meant something…

bro, correlation causes causation

That is the taboo undercurrent of most discussion sections of science papers

Re: Academia is a cult?

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MLM you say? Ok, let me see - peddling in private homes (friends and family)? check! - using social connections as marketing channel (classmates, friends and family)? check! - promising benefits, while customers have to pay upfront and wait years for see their investment (never) pay off? check! - turning customers to promoters (work environments turn away applicants without XYZ degree)? check! - kick-back/ROI is dist…

Any political party checks all those boxes.

Really? Do you pay thousands of dollars each year to, and spend your first non-child-labor years for any political party? If so, then yes that party must be a cult :-)
Post reply on HN